Literature DB >> 21381110

Exclusion of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii from a wine model system mediated by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

F Noé Arroyo-López1, Laura Pérez-Través, Amparo Querol, Eladio Barrio.   

Abstract

This study investigated the competition and potential hybrid generation between the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii in a wine-model environment. Our main goal was to understand why S. kudriavzevii has not been found in wine fermentations whilst their hybrids are present. Auxotrophic mutants (Ura(-) and Lys(-)) were used to favour the selection of hybrids and to specifically differentiate the two species in mixed fermentations carried out at different temperatures (17 °C, 24 °C and 31 °C). Both yeasts showed a reduction in their maximum specific growth rates in mixed fermentations, indicating a clear antagonistic effect between the two microorganisms. Temperature played an important role in this competition. In this way, S. kudriavzevii was less affected at 17 °C, but S. cerevisiae was clearly the best competitor at 31 °C, preventing the growth of S. kudriavzevii. Population levels of S. kudriavzevii always significantly decreased in the presence of S. cerevisiae. Ethanol was measured throughout the fermentations and in all cases S. kudriavzevii growth was arrested when ethanol levels were < 5 g/l, indicating that this compound did not influence the competitive exclusion of S. kudriavzevii. Killer factors were also discarded due to the K(-) R(-) phenotype of both strains. Finally, no prototrophic interspecific hybrids were isolated in small-scale fermentations at any temperature assayed. Our results show that the lack of competitiveness exhibited by S. kudriavzevii, especially at high temperatures, explains the absence of this species in wine fermentations, suggesting that natural S. cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii hybrids most likely originated in wild environments rather than in industrial fermentations.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21381110     DOI: 10.1002/yea.1848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  10 in total

1.  Transformation of Microbial Negative Correlations into Positive Correlations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Inoculation during Pomegranate Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Xueshan Wang; Xidong Ren; Qingqing Shao; Xiao Peng; Wenjing Zou; Zhongguan Sun; Lihua Zhang; Hehe Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Reply to Balsa-Canto et al.: Growth models are applicable to growth data, not to stationary-phase data.

Authors:  Yoav Ram; Uri Obolski; Marcus W Feldman; Judith Berman; Lilach Hadany
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolution of ecological dominance of yeast species in high-sugar environments.

Authors:  Kathryn M Williams; Ping Liu; Justin C Fay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Effect of Temperature on the Prevalence of Saccharomyces Non cerevisiae Species against a S. cerevisiae Wine Strain in Wine Fermentation: Competition, Physiological Fitness, and Influence in Final Wine Composition.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Del-Real; María Lairón-Peris; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Quantifying the Effects of Ethanol and Temperature on the Fitness Advantage of Predominant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Occurring in Spontaneous Wine Fermentations.

Authors:  Donatella Ganucci; Simona Guerrini; Silvia Mangani; Massimo Vincenzini; Lisa Granchi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Yeast-Yeast Interactions: Mechanisms, Methodologies and Impact on Composition.

Authors:  Fanny Bordet; Alexis Joran; Géraldine Klein; Chloé Roullier-Gall; Hervé Alexandre
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-20

7.  Transcriptomics of cryophilic Saccharomyces kudriavzevii reveals the key role of gene translation efficiency in cold stress adaptations.

Authors:  Jordi Tronchoni; Victor Medina; Jose Manuel Guillamón; Amparo Querol; Roberto Pérez-Torrado
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Angela Capece; Francesca Comitini; Laura Canonico; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The Use of Mixed Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii to Reduce Ethanol Content in Wine: Limited Aeration, Inoculum Proportions, and Sequential Inoculation.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Del-Real; Alba Contreras-Ruiz; Gabriel L Castiglioni; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Genomic instability in an interspecific hybrid of the genus Saccharomyces: a matter of adaptability.

Authors:  Miguel Morard; Clara Ibáñez; Ana C Adam; Amparo Querol; Eladio Barrio; Christina Toft
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.