Literature DB >> 21380848

Does a facultative mutualism limit species range expansion?

John Stanton-Geddes1, Carolyn G Anderson.   

Abstract

The availability and quality of mutualists beyond a species' range edge may limit range expansion. With the legume Chamaecrista fasciculata, we asked to what extent the availability and quality of rhizobia beyond the range edge limits host range expansion. We tested the effect of rhizobia availability on plant growth by transplanting seed from three locations into five sites spanning C. fasciculata's range (interior, at the northern and western range edges, and beyond the range edges), and inoculating half the seeds with rhizobia. We recorded growth of all surviving plants, and, for the uninoculated plants, whether they had formed nodules or not. We isolated rhizobia from nodules collected on the uninoculated plants, and cross-inoculated seed from four populations (both range edge and interior populations) in the greenhouse to determine whether the quality of rhizobia differed between regions. We found that seeds transplanted beyond the range edge were less likely to be nodulated when they were not experimentally inoculated, and there was benefit to inoculation at all sites. In the greenhouse, the three inocula that formed nodules on plants, from the range interior, northern edge and beyond the northern edge, did not detectably differ in their effect on plant growth. These results suggest that low densities of suitable rhizobia beyond the range edge may limit range expansion of legume species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380848     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1958-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

Review 1.  Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change.

Authors:  M B Davis; R G Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. II. Fitness variation across a subspecies border.

Authors:  Monica A Geber; Vincent M Eckhart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Selection of rhizobia for prairie legumes used in restoration and reconstruction programs in Minnesota.

Authors:  Becki Tlusty; Julie M Grossman; Peter H Graham
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  William F Morris; Ruth A Hufbauer; Anurag A Agrawal; James D Bever; Victoria A Borowicz; Gregory S Gilbert; John L Maron; Charles E Mitchell; Ingrid M Parker; Alison G Power; Mark E Torchin; Diego P Vázquez
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Intergenomic epistasis and coevolutionary constraint in plants and rhizobia.

Authors:  Katy D Heath
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions.

Authors:  Martin A Nuñez; Thomas R Horton; Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  NONRANDOM GENOTYPIC ASSOCIATIONS IN A LEGUME-BRADYRHIZOBIUM MUTUALISM.

Authors:  Jill M Spoerke; Heather H Wilkinson; Matthew A Parker
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Diversity and relationships of bradyrhizobia from legumes native to eastern North America.

Authors:  Matthew A Parker; David A Kennedy
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  The demography of range boundaries versus range cores in eastern US tree species.

Authors:  Drew W Purves
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  7 in total

1.  Differential effectiveness of novel and old legume-rhizobia mutualisms: implications for invasion by exotic legumes.

Authors:  Susana Rodríguez-Echeverría; Susana Fajardo; Beatriz Ruiz-Díez; Mercedes Fernández-Pascual
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Legume-rhizobium symbiotic promiscuity and effectiveness do not affect plant invasiveness.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Keet; Allan G Ellis; Cang Hui; Johannes J Le Roux
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Mutualistic rhizobia reduce plant diversity and alter community composition.

Authors:  Kane R Keller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of multiple mutualists on plants and their associated arthropod communities.

Authors:  Kane R Keller; Sara Carabajal; Felipe Navarro; Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Legume germination is delayed in dry soils and in sterile soils devoid of microbial mutualists: Species-specific implications for upward range expansions.

Authors:  Andrea M Keeler; Nicole E Rafferty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Specialization-generalization trade-off in a Bradyrhizobium symbiosis with wild legume hosts.

Authors:  Martine Ehinger; Toni J Mohr; Juliana B Starcevich; Joel L Sachs; Stephanie S Porter; Ellen L Simms
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Invasive legumes can associate with many mutualists of native legumes, but usually do not.

Authors:  Kimberly J La Pierre; Ellen L Simms; Mohsin Tariq; Marriam Zafar; Stephanie S Porter
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.