BACKGROUND: Little is known about endothelial activation under the influence of endovascular temperature management. This analysis was designed to measure the endothelial markers Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and -2 (Ang-2) in endovascularly based prophylactic normothermia versus conventional temperature management. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial patients with spontaneous subarachnoid or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage were prospectively enrolled and randomized in two treatment arms: (a) prophylactic normothermia group with target core temperature 36.5°C using endovascular cooling, (b) active control group with conventional stepwise predefined fever management using antipyretic medication and surface cooling. Blood samples were obtained on days 1, 4, and 7. In a substudy Ang-1 and -2 were measured in 63 patients for whom samples on consecutive days were available. RESULTS: The median total fever burden during the course of treatment was 0.0°C and 5.9°C h in the endovascular and the conventional group, respectively (P < 0.0001). Angiopoietin serum levels did not yield a statistical difference when comparing the two treatment arms. Ang-1 was significantly lowered, whereas Ang-2 levels were significantly elevated on day 4 compared to baseline levels irrespective of group allocation (P < 0.0001). The application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with significantly increased Ang-1 (P < 0.05) and lower Ang-2 levels on day 7 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular long-term temperature management did not alter Ang-1 and -2 levels compared to the control group indicating that the endovascular cooling technique itself does not lead to additional endothelial impairment. However, application of NSAIDs led to lower Ang-2 serum concentrations in the endovascular group.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Little is known about endothelial activation under the influence of endovascular temperature management. This analysis was designed to measure the endothelial markers Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and -2 (Ang-2) in endovascularly based prophylactic normothermia versus conventional temperature management. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial patients with spontaneous subarachnoid or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage were prospectively enrolled and randomized in two treatment arms: (a) prophylactic normothermia group with target core temperature 36.5°C using endovascular cooling, (b) active control group with conventional stepwise predefined fever management using antipyretic medication and surface cooling. Blood samples were obtained on days 1, 4, and 7. In a substudy Ang-1 and -2 were measured in 63 patients for whom samples on consecutive days were available. RESULTS: The median total fever burden during the course of treatment was 0.0°C and 5.9°C h in the endovascular and the conventional group, respectively (P < 0.0001). Angiopoietin serum levels did not yield a statistical difference when comparing the two treatment arms. Ang-1 was significantly lowered, whereas Ang-2 levels were significantly elevated on day 4 compared to baseline levels irrespective of group allocation (P < 0.0001). The application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with significantly increased Ang-1 (P < 0.05) and lower Ang-2 levels on day 7 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular long-term temperature management did not alter Ang-1 and -2 levels compared to the control group indicating that the endovascular cooling technique itself does not lead to additional endothelial impairment. However, application of NSAIDs led to lower Ang-2 serum concentrations in the endovascular group.
Authors: Michael Holzer; Marcus Müllner; Fritz Sterz; Oliver Robak; Andreas Kliegel; Heidrun Losert; Gottfried Sodeck; Thomas Uray; Andrea Zeiner; Anton N Laggner Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-06-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Paul-Thomas Brinkkoetter; Grietje C Beck; Uwe Gottmann; Ralf Loesel; Ulf Schnetzke; Boris Rudic; Christine Hanusch; Neysan Rafat; Zhenzi Liu; Christel Weiss; Henri G D Leuvinik; Rutger Ploeg; Claude Braun; Peter Schnuelle; Fokko J van der Woude; Benito A Yard Journal: Transplantation Date: 2006-08-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: J R Gamble; J Drew; L Trezise; A Underwood; M Parsons; L Kasminkas; J Rudge; G Yancopoulos; M A Vadas Journal: Circ Res Date: 2000-09-29 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Erich Schmutzhard; Klaus Engelhardt; Ronny Beer; Gregor Brössner; Bettina Pfausler; Heinz Spiss; Iris Unterberger; Andreas Kampfl Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ricardo A Hanel; Andrew R Xavier; Yousef Mohammad; Jawad F Kirmani; Abutaher M Yahia; Adnan I Qureshi Journal: Neurol Res Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.448
Authors: Gregor Broessner; Ronny Beer; Gerhard Franz; Peter Lackner; Klaus Engelhardt; Christian Brenneis; Bettina Pfausler; Erich Schmutzhard Journal: Crit Care Date: 2005-10-05 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Philipp Kümpers; Alexander Lukasz; Sascha David; Rüdiger Horn; Carsten Hafer; Robert Faulhaber-Walter; Danilo Fliser; Hermann Haller; Jan T Kielstein Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 9.097