C Oudin1, R Vialet, A Boulamery, C Martin, N Simon. 1. Réanimation Pédiatriqueet Néonatale, Départementd’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on vancomycin dosing in newborns and young infants. OBJECTIVE: The first objective was to assess the efficiency of a simplified dosing regimen with a cohort study. The secondary objective was to examine pharmacokinetic data to determine how this simplified dosing could be improved. METHODS: All neonates admitted to our intensive care unit and treated with vancomycin were included in the pharmacokinetic study (PK group, 83 treatments, 156 measurements). The vancomycin dosing regimen consisted of a loading dose of 7 mg/kg, followed by a constant continuous dose of 30 mg/kg/day. The target serum vancomycin concentration ranged from 10 mg/l to 30 mg/l. Data from patients whose medications followed the scheduled dosing without modifications or prescription errors (actual dosing group: 62 treatments, 108 measurements) were analysed separately. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed (PK group) to simulate several vancomycin dosings. RESULTS: Prescription errors were found in 10 of 83 treatments (12%). In the actual dosing group, 89.2% of vancomycin measurements were within the target range. Serum creatinine remained stable throughout treatment. Vancomycin concentrations varied widely. The modified regimen for a target vancomycin concentration of 25 mg/l consisted of a bolus of 20 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion of 30 mg/kg. CONCLUSION: Our pharmacokinetic data and bedside results suggest that a simplified schedule of vancomycin can achieve the targeted drug concentrations in most patients while avoiding secondary renal toxicity. The proposed new dosing scheme should be validated in a drug survey, but due to pharmacokinetic variability, still requires therapeutic drug monitoring.
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on vancomycin dosing in newborns and young infants. OBJECTIVE: The first objective was to assess the efficiency of a simplified dosing regimen with a cohort study. The secondary objective was to examine pharmacokinetic data to determine how this simplified dosing could be improved. METHODS: All neonates admitted to our intensive care unit and treated with vancomycin were included in the pharmacokinetic study (PK group, 83 treatments, 156 measurements). The vancomycin dosing regimen consisted of a loading dose of 7 mg/kg, followed by a constant continuous dose of 30 mg/kg/day. The target serum vancomycin concentration ranged from 10 mg/l to 30 mg/l. Data from patients whose medications followed the scheduled dosing without modifications or prescription errors (actual dosing group: 62 treatments, 108 measurements) were analysed separately. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed (PK group) to simulate several vancomycin dosings. RESULTS: Prescription errors were found in 10 of 83 treatments (12%). In the actual dosing group, 89.2% of vancomycin measurements were within the target range. Serum creatinine remained stable throughout treatment. Vancomycin concentrations varied widely. The modified regimen for a target vancomycin concentration of 25 mg/l consisted of a bolus of 20 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion of 30 mg/kg. CONCLUSION: Our pharmacokinetic data and bedside results suggest that a simplified schedule of vancomycin can achieve the targeted drug concentrations in most patients while avoiding secondary renal toxicity. The proposed new dosing scheme should be validated in a drug survey, but due to pharmacokinetic variability, still requires therapeutic drug monitoring.
Authors: Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kevin M Watt; Christoph P Hornik; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Wei Zhao; Florentia Kaguelidou; Valérie Biran; Daolun Zhang; Karel Allegaert; Edmund V Capparelli; Nick Holford; Toshimi Kimura; Yoke-Lin Lo; José-Esteban Peris; Alison Thomson; John N van den Anker; May Fakhoury; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Pieter J Colin; Karel Allegaert; Alison H Thomson; Daan J Touw; Michael Dolton; Matthijs de Hoog; Jason A Roberts; Eyob D Adane; Masato Yamamoto; Dolores Santos-Buelga; Ana Martín-Suarez; Nicolas Simon; Fabio S Taccone; Yoke-Lin Lo; Emilia Barcia; Michel M R F Struys; Douglas J Eleveld Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Tingjie Guo; Reinier M van Hest; Luca F Roggeveen; Lucas M Fleuren; Patrick J Thoral; Rob J Bosman; Peter H J van der Voort; Armand R J Girbes; Ron A A Mathot; Paul W G Elbers Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Chris Stockmann; Jonathan E Constance; Justin Stiers; Michael G Spigarelli; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Esther J H Janssen; Pyry A J Välitalo; Karel Allegaert; Roosmarijn F W de Cock; Sinno H P Simons; Catherine M T Sherwin; Johan W Mouton; Johannes N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 5.191