Literature DB >> 21378007

Comparison of the accuracy of patients' recall of the content of telephone and face-to-face consultations: an exploratory study.

Brian McKinstry1, Philip Watson, Robert A Elton, Hilary Pinnock, Gillian Kidd, Barbara Meyer, Robert Logie, Aziz Sheikh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND To comply with an action plan patients need to recall information accurately. Little is known about how well patients recall consultations, particularly telephone consultations increasingly used to triage acute problems. PURPOSE OF STUDY This was an exploratory study to measure how accurately patients recall the content of face-to-face and telephone consultations and what factors may be associated with accurate recall. STUDY DESIGN In Scotland in 2008, the advice (diagnoses; management plan(s); and safety-netting arrangements) given in audio recorded face-to-face and telephone consultations was compared with the advice recalled by patients at interview approximately 13&emsp14;days later. Patients also performed a memory test. Interactions were sought between accurate recall, consultation type, and factors postulated to influence recall. RESULTS Ten general practitioners (GPs) and 175 patients participated; 144 (82%) patients were interviewed. Patients recalled most important components of telephone and face-to-face consultations equally accurately or with only minor errors. Overall, patients presenting multiple problems (p<0.001), with brain injury (p<0.01) or low memory score (p<0.01) had reduced recall. GPs rarely used strategies to improve recall; however, these were not associated with improved recall. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to previous hospital based research, patients tended to remember important components of both face-to-face and telephone consultations-perhaps reflecting the familiar, less anxiety provoking environment of primary care. The unsuccessful use of strategies to improve recall may reflect selective use in cognitively impaired patients. Clinicians should compensate for situations where recall is poorer such as patients presenting multiple problems or with brain injury. Patients might be advised to restrict the number of problems they present in any one consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21378007     DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.101287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  8 in total

Review 1.  Telemedicine and virtual respiratory care in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Hilary Pinnock; Phyllis Murphie; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Vitalii Poberezhets
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2022-07-25

Review 2.  The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Joel D Howell; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kathryn M Harms; Noura Bashshur; Charles R Doarn
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Remote primary care consultations for people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of people living with dementia and their carers.

Authors:  Remco Tuijt; Greta Rait; Rachael Frost; Jane Wilcock; Jill Manthorpe; Kate Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.302

4.  What factors affect patients' recall of general practitioners' advice?

Authors:  Polona Selic; Igor Svab; Marija Repolusk; Nena K Gucek
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Hannah Lunn; Geoff Wong; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 7.418

6.  Patients' recall of diagnostic and treatment information improves with use of the Pain Explanation and Treatment Diagram in an outpatient chronic pain clinic.

Authors:  Hillel M Finestone; Matthew M Yanni; Catherine J Dalzell
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Communication and patient participation influencing patient recall of treatment discussions.

Authors:  Claude Richard; Emma Glaser; Marie-Thérèse Lussier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Safety netting in routine primary care consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations.

Authors:  Peter J Edwards; Matthew J Ridd; Emily Sanderson; Rebecca K Barnes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.