Literature DB >> 21377846

Waiting times for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery and the association with survival: a path analysis.

A Downing1, M S Gilthorpe, D Dodwell, G Lawrence, D Forman.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the association between radiotherapy waiting times and survival in women who have undergone breast-conserving surgery using data from two English cancer registry regions. The data were analysed using path analysis to account for the complex variable interrelationships within the data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of female invasive breast cancer diagnosed during the period 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2005 were identified and linked to an extract of Hospital Episode Statistics data. A subset of these linked records where women underwent breast-conserving surgery was extracted (n=18,158). Patient, tumour and treatment information were extracted. A path model was developed with three outcome variables: survival, time to receive radiotherapy and receipt of chemotherapy before radiotherapy.
RESULTS: During the study period, the median radiotherapy waiting time in region 1 increased from 70 days to 128.5 days. In region 2, the median wait increased from 44 days in 1998 to 68 days in 2001, then decreased to 42 days by 2005. In the path model, radiotherapy waiting time was not associated with survival (hazard ratio=1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.01 per week increase in both regions). Patients receiving chemotherapy before radiotherapy waited 12.3 weeks (region 1) and 6.3 weeks (region 2) longer for their radiotherapy than those not receiving chemotherapy. Patients with stage II/III disease waited longer than patients with stage I disease. Younger age, diagnosis of stage II/III disease and presence of co-morbidities were associated with increased odds of receiving chemotherapy before radiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found no association between waiting times for radiotherapy and survival in two regions of England, despite increases in waiting times over the study period. Such an association, if real, may only become apparent after a longer period of follow-up.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377846     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  3 in total

1.  Improving efficacy and efficiency through the implementation of a new organisational model in a Radiation Oncology Department.

Authors:  Y Lupiañez-Perez; J Gomez-Millan; M Lobato; P Pedrosa; I Lupiañez-Perez; J A Medina
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Effect of Time Interval between Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy on Outcomes of Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Taxane.

Authors:  Hyeon Kang Koh; Kyung Hwan Shin; Kyubo Kim; Eun Sook Lee; In Hae Park; Keun Seok Lee; Jungsil Ro; So-Youn Jung; Seeyoun Lee; Seok Won Kim; Han-Sung Kang; Eui Kyu Chie; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Kyung-Hun Lee; Seock-Ah Im; Sung Whan Ha
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.679

3.  The influence of timing of radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery on 10-year disease-free survival.

Authors:  Marissa C van Maaren; Reini W Bretveld; Jan J Jobsen; Renske K Veenstra; Catharina Gm Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Hendrik Struikmans; John H Maduro; Luc Ja Strobbe; Philip Mp Poortmans; Sabine Siesling
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.