Literature DB >> 21377680

Variability observed in mechano-regulated in vivo tissue differentiation can be explained by variation in cell mechano-sensitivity.

Hanifeh Khayyeri1, Sara Checa, Magnus Tägil, Per Aspenberg, Patrick J Prendergast.   

Abstract

Computational simulations of tissue differentiation have been able to capture the main aspects of tissue formation/regeneration observed in animal experiments-except for the considerable degree of variability reported. Understanding and modelling the source of this variability is crucial if computational tools are to be developed for clinical applications. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that differences in cell mechano-sensitivity between individuals can explain the variability of tissue differentiation patterns observed experimentally. Simulations of an experiment of tissue differentiation in a mechanically loaded bone chamber were performed. Finite element analysis was used to determine the biophysical environment, and a lattice-modelling approach was used to simulate cell activity. Differences in cell mechano-sensitivity among individuals were modelled as differences in cell activity rates, with the activation of cell activities regulated by the mechanical environment. Predictions of the tissue distribution in the chambers produced the two different classes of results found experimentally: (i) chambers with a layer of bone across the chamber covered by a layer of cartilage on top and (ii) chambers with almost no bone, mainly fibrous tissue and small islands of cartilage. This indicates that the differing cellular response to the mechanical environment (i.e., subject-specific mechano-sensitivity) could be a reason for the different outcomes found when implants (or tissue engineered constructs) are used in a population.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377680     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  The connection between cellular mechanoregulation and tissue patterns during bone healing.

Authors:  Felix Repp; Andreas Vetter; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.

Authors:  Kaushik Mukherjee; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  In silico bone mechanobiology: modeling a multifaceted biological system.

Authors:  Mario Giorgi; Stefaan W Verbruggen; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2016-09-07

Review 4.  Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Jason Chen; Ashkan Vaziri; Edward K Rodriguez; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2017-03-16

Review 5.  The Use of Finite Element Analyses to Design and Fabricate Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Skeletal Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Wim J Hendrikson; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Jeroen Rouwkema; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.