Literature DB >> 21377423

An application of outcomes monitoring for coronary artery bypass surgery 2005-2008 at TPCH.

Anthony Park Morton1, Susan Erica Smith, Daniel V Mullany, Andrew J B Clarke, Douglas Wall, Peter Pohlner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe monitoring of four years' isolated coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes and complications at The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
METHODS: Analysis of Cardiac Surgical Register database using tabulations, funnel plots and random-effects (Bayesian shrinkage) analysis for aggregated data. Combined CUSUM and cumulative observed minus expected (modified VLAD) charts and combined CUSUM and cumulative funnel plots used for individual observation sequential data and binomial control charts and generalised additive models (GAMs) for quarterly sequential data. Risk adjustment employed re-calibrated EuroSCORE.
RESULTS: There were 2575 procedures with an unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate of 1.17%. Mean age was 65 years and 21% of patients were female; 43.6% were elective procedures. Median ventilation time was 10 hours and median length of stay in intensive care (ICU) was 23 hours. Return to theatre for bleeding occurred in 3% of cases. Return to theatre for surgical site infection occurred in 0.4% of cases; 4% were re-do procedures. Permanent stroke or neurological deficit occurred in 1%, perioperative myocardial infarction in 0.8%, arrest in 1.2%, renal failure in 1.6% and ICU return in 2.3% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates and mortality were comparable with similar units. Use of random-effects (Bayesian shrinkage) analysis for aggregated data is encouraged together with generalised additive models (GAMs) and combined CUSUM and cumulative observed minus expected (modified VLAD) charts for sequential data. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21377423     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  2 in total

1.  The problem with dichotomizing quality improvement measures.

Authors:  James Harvey Jones; Neal Fleming
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.376

2.  Looking for a Learning Curve in EVAR Based on the Zenith Stent Graft.

Authors:  Manfred Kalteis; Peter Benedikt; Florian Huber; Florian Haller; Manfred Kastner; Herbert Lugmayr
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.