Literature DB >> 21376930

Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

David G Strauss1, Ronald H Selvester, Galen S Wagner.   

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has emerged as an attractive intervention to improve left ventricular mechanical function by changing the sequence of electrical activation. Unfortunately, many patients receiving CRT do not benefit but are subjected to device complications and costs. Thus, there is a need for better selection criteria. Current criteria for CRT eligibility include a QRS duration ≥ 120 ms. However, QRS morphology is not considered, although it can indicate the cause of delayed conduction. Recent studies have suggested that only patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) benefit from CRT, and not patients with right bundle branch block or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. The authors review the pathophysiologic and clinical evidence supporting why only patients with complete LBBB benefit from CRT. Furthermore, they review how the threshold of 120 ms to define LBBB was derived subjectively at a time when criteria for LBBB and right bundle branch block were mistakenly reversed. Three key studies over the past 65 years have suggested that 1/3 of patients diagnosed with LBBB by conventional electrocardiographic criteria may not have true complete LBBB, but likely have a combination of left ventricular hypertrophy and left anterior fascicular block. On the basis of additional insights from computer simulations, the investigators propose stricter criteria for complete LBBB that include a QRS duration ≥ 140 ms for men and ≥ 130 ms for women, along with mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥ 2 contiguous leads. Further studies are needed to reinvestigate the electrocardiographic criteria for complete LBBB and the implications of these criteria for selecting patients for CRT. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21376930     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  145 in total

Review 1.  Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Josephine C Chou; Marshall Hyden; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Software-dependent processing variability in SPECT functional parameters: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; Prem Soman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Novel measure of electrical dyssynchrony predicts response in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results from the SMART-AV Trial.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Alan Cheng; Jason Park; Nicholas Wold; Timothy E Meyer; Michael R Gold; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 4.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Mechanistic insight into prolonged electromechanical delay in dyssynchronous heart failure: a computational study.

Authors:  Jason Constantino; Yuxuan Hu; Albert C Lardo; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Roles and indications for use of implantable defibrillator and resynchronization therapy in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Jayson R Baman; Bronislava Polonsky
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  T wave positivity in lead aVR is associated with mortality in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Yahya Kemal İçen; Yurdaer Dönmez; Hasan Koca; Mehmet Uğurlu; Mevlüt Koç
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-04-08       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Low lead one ratio predicts clinical outcomes in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Brett D Atwater; Xiaojuan Xia; Jimmy Axelsson; Igor Klem; Robin Nijveldt; Erik B Schelbert; Jean-Philippe Couderc; David G Strauss; Martin Ugander; Björn Wieslander
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  Lead one ratio in left bundle branch block predicts poor cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Claus Graff; Peter L Sørensen; Steen M Hansen; Bjorn Wieslander; Martin Ugander; Peter Søgaard; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 10.  Toward Sex-Specific Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

Authors:  Robbert Zusterzeel; Kimberly A Selzman; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; Daniel A Caños; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen; Anton P M Gorgels; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.