Literature DB >> 21376904

Effects of steering demand on lane keeping behaviour, self-reports, and physiology. A simulator study.

Chris Dijksterhuis1, Karel A Brookhuis, Dick De Waard.   

Abstract

In this study a driving simulator was used to determine changes in mental effort in response to manipulations of steering demand. Changes in mental effort were assessed by using subjective effort ratings, physiology, and the standard deviation of the lateral position. Steering demand was increased by exposure to narrow lane widths and high density oncoming traffic while speed was fixed in all conditions to prevent a compensatory reaction. Results indicated that both steering demand factors influence mental effort expenditure and using multiple measures contributes to effort assessment. Application of these outcomes for adaptive automation is envisaged.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21376904     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  10 in total

1.  Cardiovascular state changes in simulated work environments.

Authors:  Arjan Stuiver; Ben Mulder
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  Mental workload and driving.

Authors:  Julie Paxion; Edith Galy; Catherine Berthelon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-02

Review 3.  Respiratory Changes in Response to Cognitive Load: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mariel Grassmann; Elke Vlemincx; Andreas von Leupoldt; Justin M Mittelstädt; Omer Van den Bergh
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Age-Related Differences in Pro-active Driving Behavior Revealed by EEG Measures.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann; Stefan Arnau; Melanie Karthaus; Julian Elias Reiser; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Physiological indices and driving performance of drivers at tunnel entrances and exits: A simulated driving study.

Authors:  Jinliang Xu; Xiaodong Zhang; Huan Liu; Kaige Yang; Fangchen Ma; Haoru Li; Yufei Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Classifying visuomotor workload in a driving simulator using subject specific spatial brain patterns.

Authors:  Chris Dijksterhuis; Dick de Waard; Karel A Brookhuis; Ben L J M Mulder; Ritske de Jong
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Obstacle avoidance, visual detection performance, and eye-scanning behavior of glaucoma patients in a driving simulator: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Rocío Prado Vega; Peter M van Leeuwen; Elizabeth Rendón Vélez; Hans G Lemij; Joost C F de Winter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prefrontal Cortex Activation and Young Driver Behaviour: A fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Hannah J Foy; Patrick Runham; Peter Chapman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups.

Authors:  Jesse Michaels; Romain Chaumillon; David Nguyen-Tri; Donald Watanabe; Pierro Hirsch; Francois Bellavance; Guillaume Giraudet; Delphine Bernardin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Gesine Märker; Natasha McBride; Pernilla Pellinen; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.