BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can cause cardiomyopathy. The mechanism is not known and may be multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the role of PVC interpolation in PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. METHODS: In 51 consecutive patients (14 women, age 49 ± 15 years, ejection fraction (EF) 0.49 ± 0.14) with frequent PVCs, 24-hour Holter recordings were performed. The amount of interpolation was determined and correlated with the presence of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. In addition, parameters measured during an electrophysiology study were correlated with the Holter findings. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 21 patients (67%) with cardiomyopathy had interpolated PVCs, compared with only 6 of 30 patients (20%) without PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (P <.001). Patients with interpolated PVCs had a higher PVC burden than patients without interpolation (28% ± 12% vs. 15% ± 15%; P = .002). The burden of interpolated PVCs correlated with the presence of PVC cardiomyopathy (21% ± 30% vs. 4% ± 13%; P = .008). Both PVC burden and interpolation independently predicted PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.13, P = .02; and odds ratio 4.43, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 18.48, P = .04, respectively). The presence of ventriculoatrial block at a ventricular pacing cycle length of 600 ms correlated with the presence of interpolation (P = .004). Patients with interpolation had a longer mean ventriculoatrial block cycle length than patients without interpolated PVCs (520 ± 110 ms vs. 394 ± 92 ms; P = .01). CONCLUSION: The presence of interpolated PVCs was predictive of the presence of PVC cardiomyopathy. Interpolation may play an important role in the generation of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) can cause cardiomyopathy. The mechanism is not known and may be multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the role of PVC interpolation in PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. METHODS: In 51 consecutive patients (14 women, age 49 ± 15 years, ejection fraction (EF) 0.49 ± 0.14) with frequent PVCs, 24-hour Holter recordings were performed. The amount of interpolation was determined and correlated with the presence of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. In addition, parameters measured during an electrophysiology study were correlated with the Holter findings. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 21 patients (67%) with cardiomyopathy had interpolated PVCs, compared with only 6 of 30 patients (20%) without PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (P <.001). Patients with interpolated PVCs had a higher PVC burden than patients without interpolation (28% ± 12% vs. 15% ± 15%; P = .002). The burden of interpolated PVCs correlated with the presence of PVC cardiomyopathy (21% ± 30% vs. 4% ± 13%; P = .008). Both PVC burden and interpolation independently predicted PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.13, P = .02; and odds ratio 4.43, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 18.48, P = .04, respectively). The presence of ventriculoatrial block at a ventricular pacing cycle length of 600 ms correlated with the presence of interpolation (P = .004). Patients with interpolation had a longer mean ventriculoatrial block cycle length than patients without interpolated PVCs (520 ± 110 ms vs. 394 ± 92 ms; P = .01). CONCLUSION: The presence of interpolated PVCs was predictive of the presence of PVC cardiomyopathy. Interpolation may play an important role in the generation of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Jonathan Potfay; Karoly Kaszala; Alex Y Tan; Adam P Sima; John Gorcsan; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jose F Huizar Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2015-08-21