Literature DB >> 21376564

A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour.

M R Douma1, J M Middeldorp, R A Verwey, A Dahan, R Stienstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The μ-opioid agonist remifentanil has a rapid onset and offset and a short half-life making it an attractive option for intravenous patient-controlled labour analgesia. We aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour.
METHODS: Parturients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil (n=10) or epidural analgesia (n=10). Pain and satisfaction scores were assessed every hour by means of visual analogue scale, together with an observer sedation score. Side effects and neonatal outcome were noted.
RESULTS: After one hour, visual analogue pain scores had decreased significantly in both groups (remifentanil: -3.8 ± 2.6, P<0.01; epidural -6.7 ± 2.0, P<0.01). The decrease in pain scores in the epidural group was significantly greater than the remifentanil group at all time intervals. The decrease in pain scores was sustained in the epidural group whereas in the remifentanil group pain scores increased over time. Oxygen saturation was significantly lower in the remifentanil group after one hour of treatment compared to the epidural group (95.2 ± 2.4% vs. 99.0 ± 1.1%, P<0.01). Patient satisfaction scores during and after delivery were similar in both groups. No differences were found in neonatal outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In the 20 patients recruited to this study, pain relief in labour with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil was more effective than with intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21376564     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  12 in total

Review 1.  Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Stephanie Weibel; Yvonne Jelting; Arash Afshari; Nathan Leon Pace; Leopold Hj Eberhart; Johanna Jokinen; Thorsten Artmann; Peter Kranke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac during trial of labour after caesarean section.

Authors:  Lysanne D C Graafmans; Marja G K Dijksterhuis; Louwerens D Vos; Jeroen van Bavel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-02

Review 3.  Remifentanil for labor analgesia: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Yayoi Ohashi; Leyla Baghirzada; Hiroyuki Sumikura; Mrinalini Balki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Millicent Anim-Somuah; Rebecca Md Smyth; Allan M Cyna; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial.

Authors:  Liv M Freeman; Kitty W Bloemenkamp; Maureen T Franssen; Dimitri N Papatsonis; Petra J Hajenius; Markus W Hollmann; Mallory D Woiski; Martina Porath; Hans J van den Berg; Erik van Beek; Odette W H M Borchert; Nico Schuitemaker; J Marko Sikkema; A H M Kuipers; Sabine L M Logtenberg; Paulien C M van der Salm; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Enrico Lopriore; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Saskia le Cessie; Jan M van Lith; Michel M Struys; Ben Willem J Mol; Albert Dahan; Johanna M Middeldorp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-23

6.  Intravenous remifentanil versus epidural ropivacaine with sufentanil for labour analgesia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rong Lin; Yiyi Tao; Yibing Yu; Zhendong Xu; Jing Su; Zhiqiang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Must we press on until a young mother dies? Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in labour may not be suited as a "poor man's epidural".

Authors:  Peter Kranke; Thierry Girard; Patricia Lavand'homme; Andrea Melber; Johanna Jokinen; Ralf M Muellenbach; Johannes Wirbelauer; Arnd Hönig
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Liv M Freeman; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Maureen T M Franssen; Dimitri N M Papatsonis; Petra J Hajenius; Marloes E van Huizen; Henk A Bremer; Eline S A van den Akker; Mallory D Woiski; Martina M Porath; Erik van Beek; Nico Schuitemaker; Paulien C M van der Salm; Bianca F Fong; Celine Radder; Caroline J Bax; Marko Sikkema; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Jan M M van Lith; Enrico Lopriore; Renske J Uildriks; Michel M R F Struys; Ben Willem J Mol; Albert Dahan; Johanna M Middeldorp
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of remifentanil as an alternative labor analgesic.

Authors:  Sandeep Devabhakthuni
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Womens Health       Date:  2013-05-06

10.  The RESPITE trial: remifentanil intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus pethidine intramuscular injection for pain relief in labour: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew Wilson; Christine MacArthur; Fang Gao Smith; Leanne Homer; Kelly Handley; Jane Daniels
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.