Literature DB >> 21376492

Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis in head and neck cancers.

Francis Kar-Ho Lee1, Ann Dorothy King, Brigitte Buig-Yue Ma, David Ka-Wai Yeung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the potential of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis of head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DCE-MRI was performed in 26 patients with untreated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 28 undifferentiated carcinoma (UD) and 8 lymphoma. DCE-MRI was analyzed with the pharmacokinetic model proposed by Tofts and Kermode to produce the three DCE parameters: k(trans), v(e) and v(p). Areas under the curve (AUC) at the initial 60 and 90s (AUC60 and AUC90) were also recorded. Histogram analysis was conducted to obtain the mean, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% percentile values and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the DCE parameters between the three groups of cancer.
RESULTS: k(trans), AUC60 and AUC90 showed significant differences (p<0.01) between UD/SCC and UD/lymphoma, but not between SCC/lymphoma. The mean AUC90 demonstrated the highest accuracy of 78% (sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 88%) for distinguishing UD and SCC, and the 75% percentile AUC90 provided the highest accuracy of 97% (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 88.5%) for distinguishing UD and lymphoma.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the DCE parameters which show the potential for distinguishing UD from SCC or lymphoma.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21376492     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  20 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary study of the correlations between quantitative parameters and the clinical stage.

Authors:  T Chikui; E Kitamoto; Y Kami; S Kawano; K Kobayashi; T Kamitani; M Obara; K Yoshiura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal lymphoma based on DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI.

Authors:  Chengru Song; Peng Cheng; Jingliang Cheng; Yong Zhang; Mengtian Sun; Shanshan Xie; Xiaonan Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Initial experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Qian-Jun Jia; Shui-Xing Zhang; Wen-Bo Chen; Long Liang; Zheng-Gen Zhou; Qian-Hui Qiu; Zai-Yi Liu; Qiong-Xin Zeng; Chang-Hong Liang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters as Biomarkers in Assessing Head and Neck Lesions After Chemoradiotherapy Using a Wide-Bore 3 Tesla Scanner.

Authors:  Gergely Lerant; Peter Sarkozy; Zoltan Takacsi-Nagy; Gabor Polony; Laszlo Tamas; Erika Toth; Andras Boer; Laszlo Javor; Maria Godeny
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 5.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  S Gaddikeri; R S Gaddikeri; T Tailor; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions using volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Ziliang Cheng; Zhuo Wu; Guangzi Shi; Zhilong Yi; Mingwei Xie; Weike Zeng; Chao Song; Chushan Zheng; Jun Shen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Evaluation of Head and Neck Tumors with Functional MR Imaging.

Authors:  Jacobus F A Jansen; Carlos Parra; Yonggang Lu; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters and correlation with tumour stage.

Authors:  Bingsheng Huang; Chun-Sing Wong; Brandon Whitcher; Dora Lai-Wan Kwong; Vincent Lai; Queenie Chan; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site.

Authors:  Xiao-ping Yu; Jing Hou; Fei-ping Li; Wang Xiang; Qiang Lu; Yin Hu; Hui Wang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating parotid gland tumors.

Authors:  Nan Huang; Zebin Xiao; Yu Chen; Dejun She; Wei Guo; Xiefeng Yang; Qi Chen; Dairong Cao; Tanhui Chen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.