Literature DB >> 21376407

Prevalence of comorbidities and associated cardiac diseases in patients with valve aortic stenosis. Potential implications for the decision-making process.

Pompilio Faggiano1, Silvia Frattini, Valentina Zilioli, Andrea Rossi, Stefano Nistri, Frank L Dini, Roberto Lorusso, Cesare Tomasi, Livio Dei Cas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). However a large number of elderly patients remain untreated because of a high operative risk. The aim of this study was to assess the risk profile of a group of AS patients, evaluating the prevalence of comorbidities and associated cardiac diseases and their impact on therapeutic decisions.
METHODS: Two-hundred forty consecutive AS patients underwent complete clinical evaluation, in order to define the stenosis severity, the prevalence of several associated cardiac conditions and comorbidities. Furthermore, the treatment choices based on this approach were recorded.
RESULTS: Mean age was 78.6 ± 8.93 years, 75.5% was ≥ 75 years old, 60% females; 226 patients (94.2%) had symptoms and 54.2% was in NYHA classes III-IV. Valve area <1cm(2) was detected in 81.6% of patients. Both comorbidities and associated cardiac diseases were common; particularly, renal dysfunction was detected by estimated glomerular filtration rate in 52.7%, chronic obstructive lung disease in 25.4%, cerebrovascular/peripheral artery disease in 30.8% and 11.6%, respectively, diabetes in 30%, malignancies (current or previous) in 26.6% of patients. Among associated cardiac diseases, coronary artery disease was detected in 43.7%, LV systolic dysfunction in 28.7%, pulmonary hypertension in 67%, at least moderate mitral regurgitation in 32.5% and porcelain aorta in 7.5% of patients. Fourteen asymptomatic patients (pts) (5.9%) remained in follow-up, 77 (32%) underwent surgical AVR, 64 (26.7%) underwent transcatheter valve implantation, 28 (11.6%) underwent balloon valvuloplasty and 57 (23.8%), despite symptoms, remained on medical therapy alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities and coexisting cardiac diseases are very common in AS and may strongly influence the decision-making process.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21376407     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  20 in total

1.  Is comorbidity equivalent to symptoms in asymptomatic AS?

Authors:  Daniyar Gilmanov; Annamaria Mazzone; Sergio Berti; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  An autopsy case of aortic root rupture with thin porcelain aorta during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hiroto Suzuyama; Tomohiro Sakamoto; Yutaka Konami; Eiji Taguchi; Yoko Horibata; Kazuhiro Nishigami; Koichi Nakao; Takihiro Kamio; Ichiro Ideta; Hideyuki Uesugi; Koutaro Murakami; Yoshikazu Haratake
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 3.  Strategy for Porcelain Ascending Aorta in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Shunji Osaka; Masashi Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.520

4.  In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Priyank Shah; Perwaiz M Meraj
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Characteristics of aorto-iliofemoral arterial tree according to aortic valve morphology in chinese patients considered for TAVR.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Hasan Jilaihawi; Guanyuan Song; Moyang Wang; Bin Lv; Hao Wang; Guannan Niu; Zheng Zhou; Yongjian Wu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?

Authors:  Serban Mihai Balanescu; Dinu Valentin Balanescu; Teodora Donisan; Eric H Yang; Nicolas Palaskas; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Saamir Hassan; Peter Kim; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Biswajit Kar; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement-a case report.

Authors:  Miha Mrak; Jana Ambrožič; Špela Mušič; Simon Terseglav; Bojan Kontestabile; Nikola Lakič; Matjaž Bunc
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Prognostic value of mild-to-moderate pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Christine S Zuern; Christian Eick; Konstantinos Rizas; Cosmina Stoleriu; Barbara Woernle; Stephen Wildhirt; Christian Herdeg; Ulrich Stock; Meinrad Gawaz; Axel Bauer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Preoperative pulmonary function tests predict mortality after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Matthew C Henn; Alan Zajarias; Brian R Lindman; Jason W Greenberg; Spencer J Melby; Nishath Quader; Anna M Vatterott; Cassandra Lawler; Marci S Damiano; Eric Novak; John M Lasala; Marc R Moon; Jennifer S Lawton; Ralph J Damiano; Hersh S Maniar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Low contrast medium-volume third-generation dual-source computed tomography angiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning.

Authors:  Lloyd M Felmly; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Andrew D McQuiston; Sheldon E Litwin; Richard R Bayer; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.