Literature DB >> 21376366

Phosphate rock formation and marine phosphorus geochemistry: the deep time perspective.

Gabriel M Filippelli1.   

Abstract

The role that phosphorite formation, the ultimate source rock for fertilizer phosphate reserves, plays in the marine phosphorus (P) cycle has long been debated. A shift has occurred from early models that evoked strikingly different oceanic P cycling during times of widespread phosphorite deposition to current thinking that phosphorite deposits may be lucky survivors of a series of inter-related tectonic, geochemical, sedimentological, and oceanic conditions. This paradigm shift has been facilitated by an awareness of the widespread nature of phosphogenesis-the formation of authigenic P-bearing minerals in marine sediments that contributes to phosphorite formation. This process occurs not just in continental margin sediments, but in deep sea oozes as well, and helps to clarify the driving forces behind phosphorite formation and links to marine P geochemistry. Two processes come into play to make phosphorite deposits: chemical dynamism and physical dynamism. Chemical dynamism involves the diagenetic release and subsequent concentration of P-bearing minerals particularly in horizons, controlled by a number of sedimentological and biogeochemical factors. Physical dynamism involves the reworking and sedimentary capping of P-rich sediments, which can either concentrate the relatively heavy and insoluble disseminated P-bearing minerals or provide an episodic change in sedimentology to concentrate chemically mobilized P. Both processes can result from along-margin current dynamics and/or sea level variations. Interestingly, net P accumulation rates are highest (i.e., the P removal pump is most efficient) when phosphorites are not forming. Both physical and chemical pathways involve processes not dominant in deep sea environments and in fact not often coincide in space and time even on continental margins, contributing to the rarity of high-quality phosphorite deposits and the limitation of phosphate rock reserves. This limitation is becoming critical, as the human demand for P far outstrips the geologic replacement for P and few prospects exist for new discoveries of phosphate rock.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21376366     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  4 in total

1.  The role of microbes in the formation of modern and ancient phosphatic mineral deposits.

Authors:  Chris H Crosby; Jake V Bailey
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 2.  A review of phosphate mineral nucleation in biology and geobiology.

Authors:  Sidney Omelon; Marianne Ariganello; Ermanno Bonucci; Marc Grynpas; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Visualizing Alternative Phosphorus Scenarios for Future Food Security.

Authors:  Tina-Simone Neset; Dana Cordell; Steve Mohr; Froggi VanRiper; Stuart White
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2016-10-28

4.  Orbitally paced phosphogenesis in Mediterranean shallow marine carbonates during the middle Miocene Monterey event.

Authors:  Gerald Auer; Christoph A Hauzenberger; Markus Reuter; Werner E Piller
Journal:  Geochem Geophys Geosyst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.624

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.