BACKGROUND: Treatment with Peg-interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) for HIV patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 has suboptimal rates of response. Viral kinetics has emerged as one of the best prognostic factors of treatment outcome. METHODS: Twenty HIV/HCV genotype 1 co-infected patients in treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV, had blood drawn at baseline, 24 h, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks. HCV-RNA levels were evaluated at each time point. ROC curves were used to evaluate the log10 HCV-RNA decay at 24 h that exhibits the best predictive value of achieving response. Genomic characterization of HCV NS5A at both interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) and protein-kinase binding (PKRBD) domains were performed in order to evaluate its heterogeneity and association with 24 h HCV-RNA decay and SVR. RESULTS: Non-responder patients exhibited a mean of 0.7 log10 (SD 0.74 log10) HCV-RNA decay at 24 h, whereas responder-patients presented 1.6 log10 (SD 0.28 log10), p = 0.04. A reduction in HCV viral load from baseline to 24 h of < 1.4 had a negative predictive value for achieving SVR of 100% and a positive predictive value of 50%. HCV genotype 1 isolates from patients with a decrease of HCV-RNA at 24 h > 1.4 log10, exhibited 3.1(SD 1.5) amino acids substitutions in ISDR and 4.8(SD 2.3) in PKRBD regions and 1.6(SD 0.7) and 2.4(SD 1.3), respectively, in those patients presenting lower reduction in HCV-RNA. CONCLUSIONS: HIV/HCV genotype 1 co-infected patients with a decrease in HCV-VL at 24 h > 1.4 log10 are more likely to achieve SVR when treated with PEG-IFN/RBV than those with lower levels of HCV-RNA decay. Along with other host-related and viral-related prognostic factors in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, this very early time point of evaluation could be of relevance in the management of HCV-specific treatment.
BACKGROUND: Treatment with Peg-interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) for HIV patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 has suboptimal rates of response. Viral kinetics has emerged as one of the best prognostic factors of treatment outcome. METHODS: Twenty HIV/HCV genotype 1 co-infected patients in treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV, had blood drawn at baseline, 24 h, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks. HCV-RNA levels were evaluated at each time point. ROC curves were used to evaluate the log10 HCV-RNA decay at 24 h that exhibits the best predictive value of achieving response. Genomic characterization of HCV NS5A at both interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) and protein-kinase binding (PKRBD) domains were performed in order to evaluate its heterogeneity and association with 24 h HCV-RNA decay and SVR. RESULTS: Non-responder patients exhibited a mean of 0.7 log10 (SD 0.74 log10) HCV-RNA decay at 24 h, whereas responder-patients presented 1.6 log10 (SD 0.28 log10), p = 0.04. A reduction in HCV viral load from baseline to 24 h of < 1.4 had a negative predictive value for achieving SVR of 100% and a positive predictive value of 50%. HCV genotype 1 isolates from patients with a decrease of HCV-RNA at 24 h > 1.4 log10, exhibited 3.1(SD 1.5) amino acids substitutions in ISDR and 4.8(SD 2.3) in PKRBD regions and 1.6(SD 0.7) and 2.4(SD 1.3), respectively, in those patients presenting lower reduction in HCV-RNA. CONCLUSIONS: HIV/HCV genotype 1 co-infected patients with a decrease in HCV-VL at 24 h > 1.4 log10 are more likely to achieve SVR when treated with PEG-IFN/RBV than those with lower levels of HCV-RNA decay. Along with other host-related and viral-related prognostic factors in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, this very early time point of evaluation could be of relevance in the management of HCV-specific treatment.
Authors: M Lindh; B Arnholm; A Eilard; M Färkkilä; K Hellstrand; M Lagging; N Langeland; K Mørch; S Nilsson; C Pedersen; M R Buhl; T Wahlberg; R Wejstål; J Westin; G Norkrans Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: F Bolcic; L Bull; L Martinez; R Reynoso; H Salomon; R Arduino; B Barnett; J Quarleri Journal: Intervirology Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: E S A Araújo; H Dahari; A U Neumann; N de Paula Cavalheiro; C E Melo; E S de Melo; T J Layden; S J Cotler; A A Barone Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Valerianna K Amorosa; Jihad Slim; Karam Mounzer; Christopher Bruno; Margaret Hoffman-Terry; Zachariah Dorey-Stein; Thomas Ferrara; Jay R Kostman; Vincent Lo Re Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2010
Authors: Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; Lennox J Jeffers; Muhammad Y Sheikh; Lorenzo Rossaro; Victor Ankoma-Sey; Fayez M Hamzeh; Paul Martin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Avidan U Neumann; Stephen Pianko; Stefan Zeuzem; Eric M Yoshida; Yves Benhamou; Moshe Mishan; John G McHutchison; Erik Pulkstenis; G Mani Subramanian Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: G Bortoletto; L Scribano; S Realdon; M Marcolongo; S Mirandola; L Franceschini; S Bonisegna; F Noventa; M Plebani; D Martines; A Alberti Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Raymond T Chung; Janet Andersen; Paul Volberding; Gregory K Robbins; Tun Liu; Kenneth E Sherman; Marion G Peters; Margaret J Koziel; Atul K Bhan; Beverly Alston; Dodi Colquhoun; Tom Nevin; George Harb; Charles van der Horst Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nathan Ford; Catherine Kirby; Kasha Singh; Edward J Mills; Graham Cooke; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Philipp duCros Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Anna Davies; Kasha P Singh; Zara Shubber; Philipp Ducros; Edward J Mills; Graham Cooke; Nathan Ford Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 3.240