Literature DB >> 21375848

Intraoperative assessment of breast cancer specimens decreases cost and number of reoperations.

John M Uecker1, Eric H Bui, Kelli H Foulkrod, John P Sabra.   

Abstract

It is the aim of our study to determine if the assessment of intraoperative breast cancer margins leads to decreased incidence of repeat operations and decreased cost. We collected data prospectively from two hospitals in Austin, TX, University Medical Center at Brackenridge (UMCB) and Seton Northwest Hospital (SNW), over a 2-year period. Comparison was made to see if intraoperative margin assessment affected total surgical costs and need for reoperation. One hundred and seven cases met criteria for inclusion in the study (UMCB = 45, SNW = 62). Intraoperative margin assessment was used in zero cases at SNW (0%) and in 17 at UMCB (38%). Intraoperative assessment was used in 16 per cent of total cases. Sixty per cent of cases at SNW required subsequent return to the operating room. Twenty-four per cent of cases at UMCB required subsequent reoperation (P < 0.05). The average number of surgical interventions required was 1 ± 0.3 with intraoperative assessment, 2 ± 0.6 without, (P < 0.05). Total surgical costs were $15,341 ± $4,328 with intraoperative assessment and $22,013 ± $13,821 without (P < 0.05). Use of intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer operations leads to both a decrease in reoperations as well as a decrease in total operative costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21375848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Rapid imaging of surgical breast excisions using direct temporal sampling two photon fluorescent lifetime imaging.

Authors:  Michael G Giacomelli; Yuri Sheikine; Hilde Vardeh; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Assessment of breast pathologies using nonlinear microscopy.

Authors:  Yuankai K Tao; Dejun Shen; Yuri Sheikine; Osman O Ahsen; Helen H Wang; Daniel B Schmolze; Nicole B Johnson; Jeffrey S Brooker; Alex E Cable; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karla Esbona; Zhanhai Li; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Nina R Horowitz; Brigid K Killelea; Theodore Tsangaris; Peter Longley; Sonia Grizzle; Michael Loftus; Fangyong Li; Meghan Butler; Karen Stavris; Xiaopan Yao; Malini Harigopal; Veerle Bossuyt; Donald R Lannin; Lajos Pusztai; Amy J Davidoff; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Spectrally encoded confocal microscopy for diagnosing breast cancer in excision and margin specimens.

Authors:  Elena F Brachtel; Nicole B Johnson; Amelia E Huck; Travis L Rice-Stitt; Mark G Vangel; Barbara L Smith; Guillermo J Tearney; Dongkyun Kang
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Rapid virtual hematoxylin and eosin histology of breast tissue specimens using a compact fluorescence nonlinear microscope.

Authors:  Lucas C Cahill; Michael G Giacomelli; Tadayuki Yoshitake; Hilde Vardeh; Beverly E Faulkner-Jones; James L Connolly; Chi-Kuang Sun; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Alberto Nunez; Veronica Jones; Katherine Schulz-Costello; Daniel Schmolze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.