| Literature DB >> 21375776 |
Vincent L Sorrell1, Vijayasree Paleru, Maria I Altbach, Ronald W Hilwig, Karl B Kern, Mohamed Gaballa, Gordon A Ewy, Robert A Berg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 'Stone heart' resulting from ischemic contracture of the myocardium, precludes successful resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that mild hypothermia might slow the progression to stone heart.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21375776 PMCID: PMC3060150 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
| Hypothermia (n = 8) | Normothermia (n = 6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (min) | LV (ml) | RV (ml) | LV (ml) | RV (ml) |
| 40 ± 3 | 46 ± 3 | 40 ± 5 | 51 ± 5 | |
| 45 ± 3* | 62 ± 5 | 48 ± 3 | 67 ± 4 | |
| 46 ± 4 | 62 ± 5 | 47 ± 3 | 65 ± 4 | |
| 44 ± 4 | 62 ± 6 | 47 ± 2 | 65 ± 3 | |
| 43 ± 5 | 60 ± 6 | 46 ± 2 | 62 ± 3 | |
| 40 ± 8 | 58 ± 6 | 33 ± 7 | 59 ± 3 | |
| 40 ± 6* | 56 ± 6 | 12 ± 1 | 51 ± 2 | |
| 36 ± 8* | 50 ± 8 | --------- | --------- | |
| 31 ± 5* | 49 ± 7 | --------- | --------- | |
| 19 ± 3* | 41 ± 4 | --------- | --------- | |
| 14 ± 2* | 37 ± 4 | --------- | --------- | |
| 12 ± 2 | 34 ± 4 | --------- | --------- | |
| 12 ± 2 | 34 ± 4 | --------- | --------- | |
Changes in ventricular dimensions during normal sinus rhythm and during VF in both normothermia and mild hypothermia groups. Data are mean ± SE, *p < 0.05 hypothermia vs normothermia.
Figure 1Cardiac Magnetic Resonance images of the swine heart at the level of the mid-ventricular short axis view of the right and left ventricles. a) A representative normothermia animal over 30 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation. Stone heart in this example developed at ~25 minutes; b) A representative hypothermia animal over 100 minutes of untreated VF. Stone heart in this animal developed at ~90 minutes. Time 0 refers to time ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced, and next 8 views were at respectively labeled duration of untreated VF; c) MRI "zoom" comparison of the 30 minute image for the representative normothermia animal (left) and the hypothermia animal (right).
Figure 2The time course of mean left ventricular (LV) volumes (mean ± SEM) during untreated VF in both normothermia and hypothermia swine. *Ventricular volume differs between the two groups with less dilation of hypothermia group (p < 0.05). #Ventricular volume differs between the two groups with less contracture in the hypothermia group (p < 0.001). The dashed and dotted line represents baseline LV volumes at VF onset. The even dashed line represents LV volume at stone heart. The thin arrow represents time to stone heart in normothermia group. The thick arrow represents time to stone heart in hypothermia group.
Figure 3The time course of mean right ventricular (RV) volumes (mean ± SEM) during untreated ventricular fibrillation (VF) in both normothermia and hypothermia swine. Note that the right ventricle never approaches 2/3 of baseline value - never achieves stone heart.