Literature DB >> 21374090

Efficiency of a protected-area network in a Mediterranean region: a multispecies assessment with raptors.

María D Abellán1, José E Martínez, José A Palazón, Miguel A Esteve, José F Calvo.   

Abstract

Three different systems of designating protected areas in a Mediterranean region in southeastern Spain were studied, referring to their effectiveness and efficiency for protecting both the breeding territories and the suitable habitat of a set of ten raptor species. Taking into consideration the varying degrees of endangerment of these species, a map of multispecies conservation values was also drawn up and superimposed on the three protected-area systems studied. In order to compare the levels of protection afforded by the three systems, we considered two indices that measured their relative effectiveness and efficiency. The effectiveness estimated the proportion of territories or optimal habitat protected by the networks while efficiency implicitly considered the area of each system (percentage of breeding territories or optimal habitat protected per 1% of land protected). Overall, our results showed that the most efficient system was that formed by the set of regional parks and reserves (17 protected breeding territories per 100 km²), although, given its small total area, it was by far the least effective (only protecting the 21% of the breeding territories of all species and 17% of the area of high conservation value). The systems formed by the Special Protection Areas (designated under the EU "Birds Directive") and by the Special Conservation Areas (designated under the EU "Habitats Directive") notably increased the percentages of protected territories of all species (61%) and area of high conservation value (57%), but their efficiency was not as high as expected in most cases. The overall level of protection was high for all species except for the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni), an endangered falcon that inhabits pseudo-steppe and traditional agricultural habitats, which are clearly underrepresented in the protected-area network of the study region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21374090     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9640-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  19 in total

1.  Assessing state-wide biodiversity in the Florida Gap analysis project.

Authors:  L G Pearlstine; S E Smith; L A Brandt; C R Allen; W M Kitchens; J Stenberg
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Kevin J Gaston; Simon Blyth; Alex James; Val Kapos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets.

Authors:  S Chape; J Harrison; M Spalding; I Lysenko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Modeling opportunity costs of conservation in transitional landscapes.

Authors:  Robin Naidoo; Wiktor L Adamowicz
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Size-dependent resistance of protected areas to land-use change.

Authors:  Luigi Maiorano; Alessandra Falcucci; Luigi Boitani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Miguel B Araújo; Jorge M Lobo; Juan C Moreno
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation.

Authors:  Luigi Boitani; Alessandra Falcucci; Luigi Maiorano; Carlo Rondinini
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

9.  Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy.

Authors:  Luigi Maiorano; Alessandra Falcucci; Edward O Garton; Luigi Boitani
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

10.  Global mammal conservation: what must we manage?

Authors:  Gerardo Ceballos; Paul R Ehrlich; Jorge Soberón; Irma Salazar; John P Fay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Monitoring protected areas from space: A multi-temporal assessment using raptors as biodiversity surrogates.

Authors:  Adrián Regos; Luis Tapia; Alberto Gil-Carrera; Jesús Domínguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Assessment of the National Park network of mainland Spain by the Insecurity Index of vertebrate species.

Authors:  Alba Estrada; Raimundo Real
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of habitat protection under the European Natura 2000 conservation network - The example for Germany.

Authors:  Martin Friedrichs; Virgilio Hermoso; Vanessa Bremerich; Simone D Langhans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Nest sites as a key resource for population persistence: A case study modelling nest occupancy under forestry practices.

Authors:  María V Jiménez-Franco; Julia Martínez-Fernández; José E Martínez; Iluminada Pagán; José F Calvo; Miguel A Esteve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.