PURPOSE: Overexpression of CD105 (endoglin) correlates with poor prognosis in many solid tumor types. Tumor microvessel density (MVD) assessed by CD105 staining is the current gold standard for evaluating tumor angiogenesis in the clinic. The goal of this study was to develop a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for imaging CD105 expression. METHODS: TRC105, a chimeric anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody, was conjugated to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and labeled with (64)Cu. FACS analysis and microscopy studies were performed to compare the CD105 binding affinity of TRC105 and DOTA-TRC105. PET imaging, biodistribution, blocking, and ex vivo histology studies were performed on 4T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice to evaluate the ability of (64)Cu-DOTA-TRC105 to target tumor angiogenesis. Another chimeric antibody, cetuximab, was used as an isotype-matched control. RESULTS: FACS analysis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) revealed no difference in CD105 binding affinity between TRC105 and DOTA-TRC105, which was further validated by fluorescence microscopy. (64)Cu labeling was achieved with high yield and specific activity. Serial PET imaging revealed that the 4T1 tumor uptake of the tracer was 8.0 ± 0.5, 10.4 ± 2.8, and 9.7 ± 1.8%ID/g at 4, 24, and 48 h post-injection, respectively (n = 3), higher than most organs at late time points which provided excellent tumor contrast. Biodistribution data as measured by gamma counting were consistent with the PET findings. Blocking experiments, control studies with (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab, as well as ex vivo histology all confirmed the in vivo target specificity of (64)Cu-DOTA-TRC105. CONCLUSION: This is the first successful PET imaging study of CD105 expression. Fast, prominent, persistent, and CD105-specific uptake of the tracer in the 4T1 tumor was observed. Further studies are warranted and currently underway.
PURPOSE: Overexpression of CD105 (endoglin) correlates with poor prognosis in many solid tumor types. Tumor microvessel density (MVD) assessed by CD105 staining is the current gold standard for evaluating tumor angiogenesis in the clinic. The goal of this study was to develop a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for imaging CD105 expression. METHODS:TRC105, a chimeric anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody, was conjugated to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and labeled with (64)Cu. FACS analysis and microscopy studies were performed to compare the CD105 binding affinity of TRC105 and DOTA-TRC105. PET imaging, biodistribution, blocking, and ex vivo histology studies were performed on 4T1 murinebreast tumor-bearing mice to evaluate the ability of (64)Cu-DOTA-TRC105 to target tumor angiogenesis. Another chimeric antibody, cetuximab, was used as an isotype-matched control. RESULTS:FACS analysis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) revealed no difference in CD105 binding affinity between TRC105 and DOTA-TRC105, which was further validated by fluorescence microscopy. (64)Cu labeling was achieved with high yield and specific activity. Serial PET imaging revealed that the 4T1 tumor uptake of the tracer was 8.0 ± 0.5, 10.4 ± 2.8, and 9.7 ± 1.8%ID/g at 4, 24, and 48 h post-injection, respectively (n = 3), higher than most organs at late time points which provided excellent tumor contrast. Biodistribution data as measured by gamma counting were consistent with the PET findings. Blocking experiments, control studies with (64)Cu-DOTA-cetuximab, as well as ex vivo histology all confirmed the in vivo target specificity of (64)Cu-DOTA-TRC105. CONCLUSION: This is the first successful PET imaging study of CD105 expression. Fast, prominent, persistent, and CD105-specific uptake of the tracer in the 4T1 tumor was observed. Further studies are warranted and currently underway.
Authors: D M Nettelbeck; D W Miller; V Jérôme; M Zuzarte; S J Watkins; R E Hawkins; R Müller; R E Kontermann Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: E Fonsatti; L Del Vecchio; M Altomonte; L Sigalotti; M R Nicotra; S Coral; P G Natali; M Maio Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Hao Hong; Hélène A Benink; Yin Zhang; Yunan Yang; H Tetsuo Uyeda; Jonathan W Engle; Gregory W Severin; Mark G McDougall; Todd E Barnhart; Dieter H Klaubert; Robert J Nickles; Frank Fan; Weibo Cai Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Peter R Rhode; Jack O Egan; Wenxin Xu; Hao Hong; Gabriela M Webb; Xiaoyue Chen; Bai Liu; Xiaoyun Zhu; Jinghai Wen; Lijing You; Lin Kong; Ana C Edwards; Kaiping Han; Sixiang Shi; Sarah Alter; Jonah B Sacha; Emily K Jeng; Weibo Cai; Hing C Wong Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Hao Hong; Yin Zhang; Jonathan W Engle; Tapas R Nayak; Charles P Theuer; Robert J Nickles; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Hao Hong; Yongjun Yan; Sixiang Shi; Stephen A Graves; Lazura K Krasteva; Robert J Nickles; Min Yang; Weibo Cai Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Hao Hong; Yin Zhang; Hakan Orbay; Hector F Valdovinos; Tapas R Nayak; Jero Bean; Charles P Theuer; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Yin Zhang; Hao Hong; Tapas R Nayak; Hector F Valdovinos; Duane V Myklejord; Charles P Theuer; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai Journal: Angiogenesis Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 9.596