Literature DB >> 2137357

Modern aids to clinical decision-making in the acute abdomen.

S Paterson-Brown1, M N Vipond.   

Abstract

Acute abdominal pain continues to provide not only a large workload for the general surgeon but also many diagnostic and management problems. Many different techniques have been introduced over the past two decades to help in the management of the acute abdomen and this review considers their relative claims to become incorporated into the process of clinical decision-making. The evidence in support of formally structured patient interview pathways with or without computer-aided diagnostic programs is now overwhelming and should become routine. Both laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology have an important role to play in the management of patients in whom the decision to operate is in doubt, and a combination of the two would be complementary. Ultrasonography has become increasingly popular for investigating the acute abdomen, and results from specialist centres are impressive. However, the problems of operator variation and the difficulties in providing a 24-h service will probably prevent it from becoming a first-line investigation in most hospitals. Although plain radiography has been available for many years, its routine use in the management of the acute abdomen remains controversial. Recent studies have confirmed that contrast radiography is an important adjunct to decision-making, particularly in the management of large bowel obstruction, and there is increasing evidence to support its use in suspected small bowel obstruction, perforated peptic ulcer and acute diverticular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2137357     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800770105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

1.  A critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcomes.

Authors:  K B Langton; M E Johnston; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

Review 2.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

4.  [Clinical standardization in acute abdominal pain].

Authors:  C Franke; P Verreet; C Ohmann; H Böhner; H D Röher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1996

5.  Feasibility of MRI in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis: initial results.

Authors:  J T Heverhagen; N Ishaque; A Zielke; T Bohrer; H Sitter; L D Berthold; K J Klose
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  The diagnostic challenge of postoperative acute appendicitis.

Authors:  D Barr; J A van Heerden; P Mucha
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Non-specific abdominal pain in pre-menopausal women.

Authors:  J M O'Byrne; C B Dempsey; M K O'Malley; F X O'Connell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J J Gonzalez; D B Miter; J L Glass; D Paulson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected.

Authors:  H Sitter; S Hoffmann; I Hassan; A Zielke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Impact of clinical experience and diagnostic performance in patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Helena Laurell; Lars-Erik Hansson; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.