Literature DB >> 21372790

Using luciferase to image bacterial infections in mice.

Mi Hee Chang1, Suat L G Cirillo, Jeffrey D Cirillo.   

Abstract

Imaging is a valuable technique that can be used to monitor biological processes. In particular, the presence of cancer cells, stem cells, specific immune cell types, viral pathogens, parasites and bacteria can be followed in real-time within living animals. Application of bioluminescence imaging to the study of pathogens has advantages as compared to conventional strategies for analysis of infections in animal models. Infections can be visualized within individual animals over time, without requiring euthanasia to determine the location and quantity of the pathogen. Optical imaging allows comprehensive examination of all tissues and organs, rather than sampling of sites previously known to be infected. In addition, the accuracy of inoculation into specific tissues can be directly determined prior to carrying forward animals that were unsuccessfully inoculated throughout the entire experiment. Variability between animals can be controlled for, since imaging allows each animal to be followed individually. Imaging has the potential to greatly reduce animal numbers needed because of the ability to obtain data from numerous time points without having to sample tissues to determine pathogen load. This protocol describes methods to visualize infections in live animals using bioluminescence imaging for recombinant strains of bacteria expressing luciferase. The click beetle (CBRLuc) and firefly luciferases (FFluc) utilize luciferin as a substrate. The light produced by both CBRluc and FFluc has a broad wavelength from 500 nm to 700 nm, making these luciferases excellent reporters for the optical imaging in living animal models. This is primarily because wavelengths of light greater than 600 nm are required to avoid absorption by hemoglobin and, thus, travel through mammalian tissue efficiently. Luciferase is genetically introduced into the bacteria to produce light signal. Mice are pulmonary inoculated with bioluminescent bacteria intratracheally to allow monitoring of infections in real time. After luciferin injection, images are acquired using the IVIS Imaging System. During imaging, mice are anesthetized with isoflurane using an XGI-8 Gas Anethesia System. Images can be analyzed to localize and quantify the signal source, which represents the bacterial infection site(s) and number, respectively. After imaging, CFU determination is carried out on homogenized tissue to confirm the presence of bacteria. Several doses of bacteria are used to correlate bacterial numbers with luminescence. Imaging can be applied to study of pathogenesis and evaluation of the efficacy of antibacterial compounds and vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21372790      PMCID: PMC3197412          DOI: 10.3791/2547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  12 in total

1.  A clearer vision for in vivo imaging.

Authors:  R Weissleder
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  In vivo imaging of light-emitting probes.

Authors:  B W Rice; M D Cable; M B Nelson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression.

Authors:  Christopher H Contag; Michael H Bachmann
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 4.  In vivo bioluminescence imaging for integrated studies of infection.

Authors:  Timothy C Doyle; Stacy M Burns; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.715

5.  Emission spectra of bioluminescent reporters and interaction with mammalian tissue determine the sensitivity of detection in vivo.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Timothy C Doyle; Olivier Coquoz; Flora Kalish; Bradley W Rice; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Photonic detection of bacterial pathogens in living hosts.

Authors:  C H Contag; P R Contag; J I Mullins; S D Spilman; D K Stevenson; D A Benaron
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 7.  Bioluminescence.

Authors:  T Wilson; J W Hastings
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 8.  Chemistries and colors of bioluminescent reactions: a review.

Authors:  J W Hastings
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Cloning of firefly luciferase cDNA and the expression of active luciferase in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J R de Wet; K V Wood; D R Helinski; M DeLuca
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Applications of bioluminescence imaging to the study of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Martha Hutchens; Gary D Luker
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 3.715

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cytomegalovirus antivirals and development of improved animal models.

Authors:  Alistair McGregor; K Yeon Choi
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Bioluminescent imaging of Borrelia burgdorferi in vivo demonstrates that the fibronectin-binding protein BBK32 is required for optimal infectivity.

Authors:  Jenny A Hyde; Eric H Weening; Mihee Chang; Jerome P Trzeciakowski; Magnus Höök; Jeffrey D Cirillo; Jon T Skare
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Real-time bioluminescence imaging of mixed mycobacterial infections.

Authors:  MiHee Chang; Katri P Anttonen; Suat L G Cirillo; Kevin P Francis; Jeffrey D Cirillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of Gram-negative bacterial infection by a stable and conjugative bioluminescence plasmid in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yao-Kuang Huang; Chishih Chu; Chih-Hsiung Wu; Chyi-Liang Chen; Cheng-Hsun Chiu
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 8.410

5.  Intravital Fluorescence Excitation in Whole-Animal Optical Imaging.

Authors:  Fatemeh Nooshabadi; Hee-Jeong Yang; Joel N Bixler; Ying Kong; Jeffrey D Cirillo; Kristen C Maitland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visualization of a neurotropic flavivirus infection in mouse reveals unique viscerotropism controlled by host type I interferon signaling.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Li; Xiao-Dan Li; Cheng-Lin Deng; Hao-Long Dong; Qiu-Yan Zhang; Qing Ye; Han-Qing Ye; Xing-Yao Huang; Yong-Qiang Deng; Bo Zhang; Cheng-Feng Qin
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  A Dual Protective Effect of Intestinal Remote Ischemic Conditioning in a Rat Model of Total Hepatic Ischemia.

Authors:  Zoltan Czigany; Koichiro Hata; Wei Lai; Timo Schwandt; Yuzo Yamamoto; Shinji Uemoto; Rene H Tolba
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  4D multimodality imaging of Citrobacter rodentium infections in mice.

Authors:  James William Collins; Jeffrey A Meganck; Chaincy Kuo; Kevin P Francis; Gad Frankel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  In Vivo Imaging Demonstrates That Borrelia burgdorferi ospC Is Uniquely Expressed Temporally and Spatially throughout Experimental Infection.

Authors:  Jonathan T Skare; Dana K Shaw; Jerome P Trzeciakowski; Jenny A Hyde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Imaging Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice with Reporter Enzyme Fluorescence.

Authors:  Riti Sharan; Hee-Jeong Yang; Preeti Sule; Jeffrey D Cirillo
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.