BACKGROUND: : The practice environments of nurses have been studied extensively in inpatient settings, but rarely in the ambulatory context. As the majority of cancer care is delivered in ambulatory settings, a better understanding of the nursing practice environment may contribute to quality improvement efforts. OBJECTIVE: : We sought to examine the features of nursing practice environments that contribute to quality patient care and nursing job satisfaction. METHODS: : In 2009-2010, we conducted focus groups with nurses who cared for adults with cancer outside inpatient units. A semistructured moderator guide explored practice environment features that promoted safe, high-quality care and high job satisfaction. We also asked nurses to identify practice environment features that hindered quality care and reduced job satisfaction. We conducted thematic analysis to report themes and to construct a conceptual framework. RESULTS: : From 2 focus groups, composed of 13 participants, nurses reported that variability in workloads, support from managers and medical assistants, and the practice's physical resources could facilitate or hinder high-quality care and job satisfaction. High-quality communication across team members improved patient safety and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: : Consistent with research findings from inpatient settings, nurses identified staffing and resource adequacy, management support, and collegiality as important inputs to high-quality care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: : These findings can inform quality improvement initiatives in ambulatory oncology practices. Strengthening nurse-medical assistant relationships, smoothing patient workload variability, and implementing strategies to strengthen communication may contribute to quality cancer care. Studies to test our proposed conceptual framework would bridge existing knowledge gaps in ambulatory settings.
BACKGROUND: : The practice environments of nurses have been studied extensively in inpatient settings, but rarely in the ambulatory context. As the majority of cancer care is delivered in ambulatory settings, a better understanding of the nursing practice environment may contribute to quality improvement efforts. OBJECTIVE: : We sought to examine the features of nursing practice environments that contribute to quality patient care and nursing job satisfaction. METHODS: : In 2009-2010, we conducted focus groups with nurses who cared for adults with cancer outside inpatient units. A semistructured moderator guide explored practice environment features that promoted safe, high-quality care and high job satisfaction. We also asked nurses to identify practice environment features that hindered quality care and reduced job satisfaction. We conducted thematic analysis to report themes and to construct a conceptual framework. RESULTS: : From 2 focus groups, composed of 13 participants, nurses reported that variability in workloads, support from managers and medical assistants, and the practice's physical resources could facilitate or hinder high-quality care and job satisfaction. High-quality communication across team members improved patient safety and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: : Consistent with research findings from inpatient settings, nurses identified staffing and resource adequacy, management support, and collegiality as important inputs to high-quality care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: : These findings can inform quality improvement initiatives in ambulatory oncology practices. Strengthening nurse-medical assistant relationships, smoothing patient workload variability, and implementing strategies to strengthen communication may contribute to quality cancer care. Studies to test our proposed conceptual framework would bridge existing knowledge gaps in ambulatory settings.
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Sean P Clarke; Linda Flynn; Jean Ann Seago; Joanne Spetz; Herbert L Smith Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Christopher R Friese; Eileen T Lake; Linda H Aiken; Jeffrey H Silber; Julie Sochalski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Christopher R Friese; Laurel Himes-Ferris; Megan N Frasier; Marjorie C McCullagh; Jennifer J Griggs Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Christopher R Friese; Kari Mendelsohn-Victor; Bo Wen; Duxin Sun; Kathleen Sutcliffe; James J Yang; David L Ronis; Marjorie C McCullagh Journal: Trials Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Elizabeth Capezuti; Mary Elizabeth Davis; Lara Wahlberg; Theresa Lundy; Lorraine K McEvoy Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2022 Jan-Feb 01 Impact factor: 2.760