Literature DB >> 21372155

Integrative prognostic risk score in acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype.

Frederik Damm1, Michael Heuser, Michael Morgan, Katharina Wagner, Kerstin Görlich, Anika Grosshennig, Iyas Hamwi, Felicitas Thol, Ewa Surdziel, Walter Fiedler, Michael Lübbert, Lothar Kanz, Christoph Reuter, Gerhard Heil, Ruud Delwel, Bob Löwenberg, Peter J M Valk, Jürgen Krauter, Arnold Ganser.   

Abstract

To integrate available clinical and molecular information for cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) patients into one risk score, 275 CN-AML patients from multicenter treatment trials AML SHG Hannover 0199 and 0295 and 131 patients from HOVON/SAKK protocols as external controls were evaluated for mutations/polymorphisms in NPM1, FLT3, CEBPA, MLL, NRAS, IDH1/2, and WT1. Transcript levels were quantified for BAALC, ERG, EVI1, ID1, MN1, PRAME, and WT1. Integrative prognostic risk score (IPRS) was modeled in 181 patients based on age, white blood cell count, mutation status of NPM1, FLT3-ITD, CEBPA, single nucleotide polymorphism rs16754, and expression levels of BAALC, ERG, MN1, and WT1 to represent low, intermediate, and high risk of death. Complete remission (P = .005), relapse-free survival (RFS, P < .001), and overall survival (OS, P < .001) were significantly different for the 3 risk groups. In 2 independent validation cohorts of 94 and 131 patients, the IPRS predicted different OS (P < .001) and RFS (P < .001). High-risk patients with related donors had longer OS (P = .016) and RFS (P = .026) compared with patients without related donors. In contrast, intermediate-risk group patients with related donors had shorter OS (P = .003) and RFS (P = .05). Donor availability had no impact on outcome of patients in the low-risk group. Thus, the IPRS may improve consolidation treatment stratification in CN-AML patients. Study registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00209833.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21372155     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  31 in total

1.  Preclinical efficacy of MEK inhibition in Nras-mutant AML.

Authors:  Michael R Burgess; Eugene Hwang; Ari J Firestone; Tannie Huang; Jin Xu; Johannes Zuber; Natacha Bohin; Tiffany Wen; Scott C Kogan; Kevin M Haigis; Deepak Sampath; Scott Lowe; Kevin Shannon; Qing Li
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Prognostic significance of the BAALC gene expression in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Ji Xiao; Jian-Zhen Shen; Jin-Long Huang; Hai-Ying Fu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11

3.  Parameters detected by geriatric and quality of life assessment in 195 older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are highly predictive for outcome.

Authors:  Barbara Deschler; Gabriele Ihorst; Uwe Platzbecker; Ulrich Germing; Eva März; Marcelo de Figuerido; Kurt Fritzsche; Peter Haas; Helmut R Salih; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Dominik Selleslag; Boris Labar; Theo de Witte; Pierre Wijermans; Michael Lübbert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission.

Authors:  Betul Oran; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.284

5.  Combining gene mutation with gene expression analysis improves outcome prediction in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Antonio R Lucena-Araujo; Juan L Coelho-Silva; Diego A Pereira-Martins; Douglas R Silveira; Luisa C Koury; Raul A M Melo; Rosane Bittencourt; Katia Pagnano; Ricardo Pasquini; Elenaide C Nunes; Evandro M Fagundes; Ana B Gloria; Fábio Kerbauy; Maria de Lourdes Chauffaille; Israel Bendit; Vanderson Rocha; Armand Keating; Martin S Tallman; Raul C Ribeiro; Richard Dillon; Arnold Ganser; Bob Löwenberg; P J M Valk; Francesco Lo-Coco; Miguel A Sanz; Nancy Berliner; Eduardo M Rego
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Expression Pattern and Prognostic Significance of EVI1 Gene in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Normal Karyotype.

Authors:  Irena Marjanovic; Teodora Karan-Djurasevic; Tatjana Kostic; Marijana Virijevic; Nada Suvajdzic-Vukovic; Sonja Pavlovic; Natasa Tosic
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  HO-1, RET and PML as possible markers for risk stratification of acute myelocytic leukemia and prognostic evaluation.

Authors:  Meisheng Yu; Jishi Wang; Dan Ma; Shuya Chen; Xiaojing Lin; Qin Fang; Nana Zhe
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Integrating clinical features with genetic factors enhances survival prediction for adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Douglas R A Silveira; Lynn Quek; Itamar S Santos; Anna Corby; Juan L Coelho-Silva; Diego A Pereira-Martins; Grant Vallance; Benjamin Brown; Luciana Nardinelli; Wellington F Silva; Elvira D R P Velloso; Antonio R Lucena-Araujo; Fabiola Traina; Andy Peniket; Paresh Vyas; Eduardo M Rego; Israel Bendit; Vanderson Rocha
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 9.  C/EBPα dysregulation in AML and ALL.

Authors:  Ido Paz-Priel; Alan Friedman
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncog       Date:  2011

10.  Influence of molecular subgroups on outcome of acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype in 141 patients undergoing salvage allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary induction failure or beyond first relapse.

Authors:  Tim Pfeiffer; Michael Schleuning; Jiri Mayer; Karl-Heinz Haude; Johanna Tischer; Stefanie Buchholz; Donald Bunjes; Gesine Bug; Ernst Holler; Ralf G Meyer; Hildegard Greinix; Christof Scheid; Maximilian Christopeit; Susanne Schnittger; Jan Braess; Günter Schlimok; Karsten Spiekermann; Arnold Ganser; Hans-Jochem Kolb; Christoph Schmid
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.