OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to estimate the levels of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in HIV-1 using very sensitive assays to detect minority drug-resistant populations. METHODS: We tested unlinked anonymous serum specimens from sexual health clinic attendees, who had not received an HIV diagnosis at the time of sampling, by both standard genotyping and using minority detection assays. RESULTS: By standard genotyping, 21 of 165 specimens (12.7%) showed evidence of drug resistance, while, using a combination of standard genotyping and minority mutation assays targeting three commonly observed drug resistance mutations which cause high-level resistance to commonly prescribed first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), this rose to 32 of 165 (19.4%). This increase of 45% in drug resistance levels [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.2-83.7%; P=0.002] was statistically significant. Almost all of this increase was accounted for by additional detections of the M184V mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Future surveillance studies of TDR in the United Kingdom should consider combining standard genotyping and minority-specific assays to provide more accurate estimates, particularly when using specimens collected from chronic HIV infections in which TDR variants may have declined to low levels.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to estimate the levels of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in HIV-1 using very sensitive assays to detect minority drug-resistant populations. METHODS: We tested unlinked anonymous serum specimens from sexual health clinic attendees, who had not received an HIV diagnosis at the time of sampling, by both standard genotyping and using minority detection assays. RESULTS: By standard genotyping, 21 of 165 specimens (12.7%) showed evidence of drug resistance, while, using a combination of standard genotyping and minority mutation assays targeting three commonly observed drug resistance mutations which cause high-level resistance to commonly prescribed first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), this rose to 32 of 165 (19.4%). This increase of 45% in drug resistance levels [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.2-83.7%; P=0.002] was statistically significant. Almost all of this increase was accounted for by additional detections of the M184V mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Future surveillance studies of TDR in the United Kingdom should consider combining standard genotyping and minority-specific assays to provide more accurate estimates, particularly when using specimens collected from chronic HIV infections in which TDR variants may have declined to low levels.
Authors: Hong-Tao Xu; Maureen Oliveira; Peter K Quashie; Matthew McCallum; Yingshan Han; Yudong Quan; Bluma G Brenner; Mark A Wainberg Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Herbert A Mbunkah; Silvia Bertagnolio; Raph L Hamers; Gillian Hunt; Seth Inzaule; Tobias F Rinke De Wit; Roger Paredes; Neil T Parkin; Michael R Jordan; Karin J Metzner Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Dana S Clutter; W Jeffrey Fessel; Soo-Yon Rhee; Leo B Hurley; Daniel B Klein; John P A Ioannidis; Michael J Silverberg; Robert W Shafer Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Roy Moscona; Daniela Ram; Marina Wax; Efrat Bucris; Itzchak Levy; Ella Mendelson; Orna Mor Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Nicholas Silver; Mary Paynter; Georgina McAllister; Maureen Atchley; Christine Sayir; John Short; Dane Winner; David J Alouani; Freddie H Sharkey; Kicki Bergefall; Kate Templeton; David Carrington; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: AIDS Res Ther Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 2.250