Literature DB >> 21370312

Influence of the family cluster effect on psychosocial variables in families undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Julie Lapointe1, Belkacem Abdous, Stéphanie Camden, Karine Bouchard, David Goldgar, Jacques Simard, Michel Dorval.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of the family cluster effect on behavioral and psychological variables among individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
METHODS: French-Canadian women (n = 552) and men (n = 104) from 140 different families undergoing BRCA1/2 testing between years 1998 and 2004 completed a self-administered questionnaire on a wide range of behavioral and psychological variables. The impact of the family cluster effect on 29 variables was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) as computed from multilevel random-effect models.
RESULTS: ICC values were statistically significant for 22 of the 29 variables. Overall, the mean ICC value was 0.10. The ICC values for knowledge about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and frequency of alcohol consumption were 0.25. The ICC value for the Impact of Event Scale, which is a commonly used measure of cancer-specific distress, was 0.14.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the family cluster effect influences the majority of behavioral and psychosocial variables. When studying psychosocial aspects of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, the family cluster effect should be routinely accounted for when determining sample size and statistical methods.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21370312     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

1.  Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Jürgen F Riemann; Thomas Seufferlein; Max Reinshagen; Stephan Hollerbach; Ulrike Haug; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Madeleine Ritter-Herschbach; Patrick Jahn; Thomas Frese; Michael Harris; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Self-reported mammography use following BRCA1/2 genetic testing may be overestimated.

Authors:  Geneviève Larouche; Karine Bouchard; Jocelyne Chiquette; Christine Desbiens; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Decisional outcomes of maternal disclosure of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Healthy Ageing Through Internet Counselling in the Elderly: the HATICE randomised controlled trial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Edo Richard; Susan Jongstra; Hilkka Soininen; Carol Brayne; Eric P Moll van Charante; Yannick Meiller; Bram van der Groep; Cathrien R L Beishuizen; Francesca Mangialasche; Mariagnese Barbera; Tiia Ngandu; Nicola Coley; Juliette Guillemont; Stéphanie Savy; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Ron J G Peters; Willem A van Gool; Miia Kivipelto; Sandrine Andrieu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.