Literature DB >> 21369828

Integration specificity of LTR-retrotransposons and retroviruses in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

L N Nefedova1, M M Mannanova, A I Kim.   

Abstract

Integration of DNA copies in a host genome is a necessary stage in the life cycle of retroviruses and LTR-retrotransposons. There is still no clear understanding of integration specificity of retroelements into a target site. The selection of the target DNA is believed to potentially affect a number of factors such as transcriptional status, association with histones and other DNA-binding proteins, and DNA bending. The authors performed a comprehensive computer analysis of the integration specificity of Drosophila melanogaster LTR-retrotransposons and retroviruses including an analysis of the nucleotide composition of targets, terminal sequences of LTRs, and integrase sequences. A classification of LTR-retrotransposons based on the integration specificity was developed. All the LTR-retrotransposons of the gypsy group with three open frames (errantiviruses) and their derivatives with two open frames demonstrate strict specificity to a target DNA selection. Such specificity correlates with the structural features of the target DNA: bendability, A-philicity, or protein-induced deformability. The remaining LTR-retrotransposons (copia and BEL groups, blastopia and 412 subgroups of the gypsy group) do not show specificity of integration. Chromodomain is present in the integrase structures of blastopia and 412 subgroup LTR-retrotransposons and may facilitate the process of non-specific integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21369828     DOI: 10.1007/s11262-010-0566-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virus Genes        ISSN: 0920-8569            Impact factor:   2.332


  40 in total

Review 1.  Comparative architecture of transposase and integrase complexes.

Authors:  P A Rice; T A Baker
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-05

Review 2.  Retroviral mutation rates and reverse transcriptase fidelity.

Authors:  Evguenia S Svarovskaia; Sara R Cheslock; Wen-Hui Zhang; Wei-Shau Hu; Vinay K Pathak
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2003-01-01

3.  HIV-1 integration in the human genome favors active genes and local hotspots.

Authors:  Astrid R W Schröder; Paul Shinn; Huaming Chen; Charles Berry; Joseph R Ecker; Frederic Bushman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Characterization of a DNA binding domain in the C-terminus of HIV-1 integrase by deletion mutagenesis.

Authors:  A M Woerner; C J Marcus-Sekura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Mapping viral DNA specificity to the central region of integrase by using functional human immunodeficiency virus type 1/visna virus chimeric proteins.

Authors:  M Katzman; M Sudol
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  The influence of DNA and nucleosome structure on integration events directed by HIV integrase.

Authors:  D Pruss; R Reeves; F D Bushman; A P Wolffe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A novel DNA binding and nuclease activity in domain III of Mu transposase: evidence for a catalytic region involved in donor cleavage.

Authors:  Z Wu; G Chaconas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Selection of target sites for mobile DNA integration in the human genome.

Authors:  Charles Berry; Sridhar Hannenhalli; Jeremy Leipzig; Frederic D Bushman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  Integrase and integration: biochemical activities of HIV-1 integrase.

Authors:  Olivier Delelis; Kevin Carayon; Ali Saïb; Eric Deprez; Jean-François Mouscadet
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.602

10.  Sequence-dependent bending propensity of DNA as revealed by DNase I: parameters for trinucleotides.

Authors:  I Brukner; R Sánchez; D Suck; S Pongor
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-04-18       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  7 in total

1.  Whole genome resequencing reveals natural target site preferences of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Raquel S Linheiro; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Drosophila errantiviruses.

Authors:  Yury Stefanov; Veniamin Salenko; Ivan Glukhov
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2012-01-01

3.  TEMP: a computational method for analyzing transposable element polymorphism in populations.

Authors:  Jiali Zhuang; Jie Wang; William Theurkauf; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Transposable elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Tabitha J McCullers; Mindy Steiniger
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2017-04-19

Review 5.  Mechanisms of LTR-Retroelement Transposition: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lidia Nefedova; Alexander Kim
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-16       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  A novel family of terminal-repeat retrotransposon in miniature (TRIM) in the genome of the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus.

Authors:  Yihong Zhou; Sara Helms Cahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The holozoan Capsaspora owczarzaki possesses a diverse complement of active transposable element families.

Authors:  Martin Carr; Hiroshi Suga
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.416

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.