RATIONALE: Discovery of an endocannabinoid signaling system launched the development of the blocker rimonabant, a cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist. Due to untoward effects, this medication was withdrawn and efforts have been directed towards discovering chemicals with more benign profiles. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to comparatively evaluate new ligands using a rimonabant discriminated drinking aversion procedure. METHODS: Rats discriminated between rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg) and vehicle. The 30 min saccharin (0.1%) drinking after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental animals. After vehicle pretreatment, experimental animals were given i.p. NaCl (10 ml/kg). Postdrinking treatment for controls was NaCl, irrespective of pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle). RESULTS: The centrally acting neutral CB(1)R antagonist AM4113, but not the limited brain penetrating CB(1)R neutral antagonist AM6545, substituted for rimonabant. The CB(1)R agonists THC (1-10 mg/kg), AM1346 (1-10 mg/kg) did not substitute. The rimonabant-induced conditioned suppression of saccharin drinking was attenuated when CB(1)R agonists AM5983 (0.01-1 mg/kg) and THC (10 mg/kg), but not the CB(1)R agonist AM1346 (0.1-18 mg/kg), were combined with rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg). By varying the injection-to-test interval, we gauged the relative duration of the cueing effects of rimonabant, and the in vivo functional half-life was estimated to be approximately 1.5 h. CONCLUSION: A neutral CB(1)R antagonist (AM4113) produced cueing effects similar to those of rimonabant and generalization likely was centrally mediated. The functional cueing effects of rimonabant are relatively short-acting, pharmacologically selective, and differentially blocked by cannabinergics.
RATIONALE: Discovery of an endocannabinoid signaling system launched the development of the blocker rimonabant, a cannabinoidCB1 receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist. Due to untoward effects, this medication was withdrawn and efforts have been directed towards discovering chemicals with more benign profiles. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to comparatively evaluate new ligands using a rimonabant discriminated drinking aversion procedure. METHODS:Rats discriminated between rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg) and vehicle. The 30 min saccharin (0.1%) drinking after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental animals. After vehicle pretreatment, experimental animals were given i.p. NaCl (10 ml/kg). Postdrinking treatment for controls was NaCl, irrespective of pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle). RESULTS: The centrally acting neutral CB(1)R antagonist AM4113, but not the limited brain penetrating CB(1)R neutral antagonist AM6545, substituted for rimonabant. The CB(1)R agonists THC (1-10 mg/kg), AM1346 (1-10 mg/kg) did not substitute. The rimonabant-induced conditioned suppression of saccharin drinking was attenuated when CB(1)R agonists AM5983 (0.01-1 mg/kg) and THC (10 mg/kg), but not the CB(1)R agonist AM1346 (0.1-18 mg/kg), were combined with rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg). By varying the injection-to-test interval, we gauged the relative duration of the cueing effects of rimonabant, and the in vivo functional half-life was estimated to be approximately 1.5 h. CONCLUSION: A neutral CB(1)R antagonist (AM4113) produced cueing effects similar to those of rimonabant and generalization likely was centrally mediated. The functional cueing effects of rimonabant are relatively short-acting, pharmacologically selective, and differentially blocked by cannabinergics.
Authors: K S Sink; K N Segovia; L E Collins; E J Markus; V K Vemuri; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2010-03-27 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: K S Sink; K N Segovia; J Sink; P A Randall; L E Collins; M Correa; E J Markus; V K Vemuri; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Adam P Chambers; V Kiran Vemuri; Yan Peng; Jodianne T Wood; Teresa Olszewska; Quentin J Pittman; Alexandros Makriyannis; Keith A Sharkey Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: P J McLaughlin; K Winston; L Swezey; A Wisniecki; J Aberman; D J Tardif; A J Betz; K Ishiwari; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Jason M Wiebelhaus; Justin L Poklis; Alphonse Poklis; Robert E Vann; Aron H Lichtman; Laura E Wise Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Torbjörn U C Järbe; Sherrica Tai; Brian J LeMay; Spyros P Nikas; Vidyanand G Shukla; Alexander Zvonok; Alexandros Makriyannis Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Charles W Schindler; Godfrey H Redhi; Kiran Vemuri; Alexandros Makriyannis; Bernard Le Foll; Jack Bergman; Steven R Goldberg; Zuzana Justinova Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.853