T Luckett1, B Britton, K Clover, N M Rankin. 1. Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. t.luckett@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: In addition to cancer-related distress, people with head and neck cancer (HNC) endure facial disfigurement and difficulties with eating and communication. High rates of alcohol use and socio-economic disadvantage raise concerns that patients with HNC may be less likely than others to participate in and adhere to psychological interventions. This article aims to inform future practice and research by reviewing the evidence in support of psychological interventions for this patient group. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in December 2009. Relevant studies were rated for internal and external validity against the criteria of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) US Preventive Services Task Force. Wherever possible, outcomes were evaluated using effect sizes to confirm statistically significant results and enable comparison between studies. Meta-analysis was planned according to criteria in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Levels of evidence for each intervention type were evaluated using AHRQ criteria. RESULTS: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. One study was rated 'good' for internal validity and four for external validity. Psycho-education and/or cognitive-behavioural therapy were evaluated by seven studies, and communication skills training and a support group by one study each. Significant heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Based on a study-by-study review, there was most support for psycho-education, with three out of five studies finding at least some effect. CONCLUSIONS: Research to date suggests it is feasible to recruit people with HNC to psychological interventions and to evaluate their progress through repeated-outcome measures. Evidence for interventions is limited by the small number of studies, methodological problems, and poor comparability. Future interventions should target HNC patients who screen positive for clinical distress and be integrated into standard care.
PURPOSE: In addition to cancer-related distress, people with head and neck cancer (HNC) endure facial disfigurement and difficulties with eating and communication. High rates of alcohol use and socio-economic disadvantage raise concerns that patients with HNC may be less likely than others to participate in and adhere to psychological interventions. This article aims to inform future practice and research by reviewing the evidence in support of psychological interventions for this patient group. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in December 2009. Relevant studies were rated for internal and external validity against the criteria of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) US Preventive Services Task Force. Wherever possible, outcomes were evaluated using effect sizes to confirm statistically significant results and enable comparison between studies. Meta-analysis was planned according to criteria in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Levels of evidence for each intervention type were evaluated using AHRQ criteria. RESULTS: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. One study was rated 'good' for internal validity and four for external validity. Psycho-education and/or cognitive-behavioural therapy were evaluated by seven studies, and communication skills training and a support group by one study each. Significant heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Based on a study-by-study review, there was most support for psycho-education, with three out of five studies finding at least some effect. CONCLUSIONS: Research to date suggests it is feasible to recruit people with HNC to psychological interventions and to evaluate their progress through repeated-outcome measures. Evidence for interventions is limited by the small number of studies, methodological problems, and poor comparability. Future interventions should target HNC patients who screen positive for clinical distress and be integrated into standard care.
Authors: Gary Rodin; Nancy Lloyd; Mark Katz; Esther Green; Jean A Mackay; Rebecca K S Wong Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-10-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Ivan Molton; Jason R Dahn; Biing-Jiun Shen; Dave Kinsinger; Lara Traeger; Scott Siegel; Neil Schneiderman; Michael Antoni Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2006-06
Authors: Allen M Chen; Richard L S Jennelle; Victoria Grady; Adrienne Tovar; Kris Bowen; Patty Simonin; Janice Tracy; Dale McCrudden; Jonathan R Stella; Srinivasan Vijayakumar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lauren C Capozzi; Kevin R Boldt; Harold Lau; Lisa Shirt; Barry Bultz; S Nicole Culos-Reed Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Mark P Pfeifer; Cynthia Keeney; Jeffrey Bumpous; Tara J Schapmire; Jamie L Studts; John Myers; Barbara Head Journal: J Community Support Oncol Date: 2015-01
Authors: Donna M Posluszny; Angela Liegey Dougall; Jonas T Johnson; Athanassios Argiris; Robert L Ferris; Andrew Baum; Dana H Bovbjerg; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Pascal Jean-Pierre; Christopher Fundakowski; Enrique Perez; Shadae E Jean-Pierre; Ashley R Jean-Pierre; Angelica B Melillo; Rachel Libby; Zoukaa Sargi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-08-12 Impact factor: 3.603