Literature DB >> 21368755

Current practices for DNA sample collection and storage in the pharmaceutical industry, and potential areas for harmonization: perspective of the I-PWG.

M A Franc1, A W Warner, N Cohen, P M Shaw, P Groenen, A Snapir.   

Abstract

Collection and storage of DNA samples in clinical drug development programs are an important investment for the pharmaceutical industry to allow efficient evaluation of observed variability in drug response. To enable collection and future use of samples, individual companies must define (i) processes to collect specimens worldwide, (ii) whether collection is optional or mandatory, (iii) conditions and duration of sample storage, (iv) whether research data can be returned to subjects, and (v) other logistical aspects. To determine current industry practices for collection and storage of these samples, the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group (I-PWG) conducted a survey of the industry (21 respondents) to identify areas of commonality and divergence. On the basis of the survey results, the I-PWG details areas of focus for harmonization of the industry's sample collection practices. A more unified approach would facilitate DNA sample collection, thereby contributing to the advancement of personalized medicine and more efficient development of safe and effective drugs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21368755     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2010.338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of ADME pharmacogenomics in early clinical trials: perspective of the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group (I-PWG).

Authors:  Larry Tremaine; William Brian; Terrye DelMonte; Stephan Francke; Peter Groenen; Keith Johnson; Lei Li; Kimberly Pearson; Jean-Claude Marshall
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  The genetics of drug efficacy: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Matthew R Nelson; Toby Johnson; Liling Warren; Arlene R Hughes; Stephanie L Chissoe; Chun-Fang Xu; Dawn M Waterworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Predictors of consent to pharmacogenomics testing in the IDEAL study.

Authors:  Alison B Jazwinski; Paul J Clark; Alexander J Thompson; Stuart C Gordon; Eric J Lawitz; Stephanie Noviello; Clifford A Brass; Lisa D Pedicone; Janice K Albrecht; Mark S Sulkowski; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Saliva sampling in global clinical studies: the impact of low sampling volume on performance of DNA in downstream genotyping experiments.

Authors:  David J Pulford; Michael Mosteller; J David Briley; Kelley W Johansson; Anita J Nelsen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.063

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.