Literature DB >> 2136872

Clinical judgment and therapeutic decision making.

M A Hlatky1, R M Califf, F E Harrell, K L Lee, D B Mark, L H Muhlbaier, D B Pryor.   

Abstract

Clinical decision making is under increased scrutiny due to concerns about the cost and quality of medical care. Variability in physician decision making is common, in part because of deficiencies in the knowledge base, but also due to the difference in physicians' approaches to clinical problem solving. Evaluation of patient prognosis is a critical factor in the selection of therapy, and careful attention to methodology is essential to provide reliable information. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the most solid basis for the establishment of broad therapeutic principles. Because randomized studies cannot be performed to address every question, observational studies will continue to play a complementary role in the evaluation of therapy. Randomized studies in progress, meta analyses of existing data, and increased use of administrative and collaborative clinical data bases will improve the knowledge base for decision making in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2136872     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90167-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

1.  Intracoronary stents.

Authors:  M T Rothman; S W Davies
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-06

Review 2.  Ethics and evidence based medicine.

Authors:  I Kerridge; M Lowe; D Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-11

Review 3.  Does good science make good medicine? Incorporating evidence into practice is complicated by the fact that clinical practice is as much art as science.

Authors:  N P Kenny
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Protocolized approach to the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: benefits of reducing variability in care.

Authors:  Elisabeth T Tracy; Sarah E Mears; P Brian Smith; Melissa E Danko; Diana L Diesen; Kimberley A Fisher; Jeff C Hoehner; Ronald N Goldberg; C Michael Cotten; Henry E Rice
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 5.  Assessing patients with possible heart disease using scores.

Authors:  K Shetler; A Karlsdottir; V Froelicher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The impact of clinical data on interpretation of thallium scintigrams.

Authors:  M Simons; J A Parker; K J Donohoe; J E Udelson; E V Gervino
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.