Literature DB >> 21367843

Therapeutically activating RB: reestablishing cell cycle control in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer.

Chellappagounder Thangavel1, Jeffry L Dean, Adam Ertel, Karen E Knudsen, C Marcelo Aldaz, Agnieszka K Witkiewicz, Robert Clarke, Erik S Knudsen.   

Abstract

The majority of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers are treated with endocrine therapy. While this is effective, acquired resistance to therapies targeted against ER is a major clinical challenge. Here, model systems of ER-positive breast cancers with differential susceptibility to endocrine therapy were employed to define common nodes for new therapeutic interventions. These analyses revealed that cell cycle progression is effectively uncoupled from the activity and functional state of ER in these models. In this context, cyclin D1 expression and retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) phosphorylation are maintained even with efficient ablation of ER with pure antagonists. These therapy-resistant models recapitulate a key feature of deregulated RB/E2F transcriptional control. Correspondingly, a gene expression signature of RB-dysfunction is associated with luminal B breast cancer, which exhibits a relatively poor response to endocrine therapy. These collective findings suggest that suppression of cyclin D-supported kinase activity and restoration of RB-mediated transcriptional repression could represent a viable therapeutic option in tumors that fail to respond to hormone-based therapies. Consistent with this hypothesis, a highly selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, PD-0332991, was effective at suppressing the proliferation of all hormone refractory models analyzed. Importantly, PD-0332991 led to a stable cell cycle arrest that was fundamentally distinct from those elicited by ER antagonists, and was capable of inducing aspects of cellular senescence in hormone therapy refractory cell populations. These findings underscore the clinical utility of downstream cytostatic therapies in treating tumors that have experienced failure of endocrine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367843      PMCID: PMC3624623          DOI: 10.1530/ERC-10-0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  54 in total

1.  MCF7/LCC9: an antiestrogen-resistant MCF-7 variant in which acquired resistance to the steroidal antiestrogen ICI 182,780 confers an early cross-resistance to the nonsteroidal antiestrogen tamoxifen.

Authors:  N Brünner; B Boysen; S Jirus; T C Skaar; C Holst-Hansen; J Lippman; T Frandsen; M Spang-Thomsen; S A Fuqua; R Clarke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Estrogen-dependent cyclin E-cdk2 activation through p21 redistribution.

Authors:  M D Planas-Silva; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Strategies for breast cancer therapy with antiestrogens.

Authors:  V C Jordan; N F Fritz; M M Gottardis
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.292

4.  Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance: increased estrogen receptor-HER2/neu cross-talk in ER/HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiang Shou; Suleiman Massarweh; C Kent Osborne; Alan E Wakeling; Simale Ali; Heidi Weiss; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Cyclin D1 is necessary but not sufficient for anchorage-independent growth of rat mammary tumor cells and is associated with resistance of the Copenhagen rat to mammary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  You-Jun Li; Runlan Song; James E Korkola; Michael C Archer; Yaacov Ben-David
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Increased constitutive activity of PKB/Akt in tamoxifen resistant breast cancer MCF-7 cells.

Authors:  Nicola J Jordan; Julia M W Gee; Denise Barrow; Alan E Wakeling; Robert I Nicholson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Tamoxifen induces accumulation of MCF 7 human mammary carcinoma cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle.

Authors:  R L Sutherland; M D Green; R E Hall; R R Reddel; I W Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-05

8.  A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential.

Authors:  A E Wakeling; M Dukes; J Bowler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Antiestrogen regulation of cell cycle progression and cyclin D1 gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  C K Watts; K J Sweeney; A Warlters; E A Musgrove; R L Sutherland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Antiestrogen inhibition of cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells in associated with inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase activity and decreased retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  C K Watts; A Brady; B Sarcevic; A deFazio; E A Musgrove; R L Sutherland
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1995-12
View more
  106 in total

1.  Modification of the DNA damage response by therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition.

Authors:  Jeffry L Dean; A Kathleen McClendon; Erik S Knudsen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  The Role of CDK4/6 Inhibition in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Conleth G Murphy; Maura N Dickler
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Cynthia X Ma; Tomás Reinert; Izabela Chmielewska; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  The history and future of targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Uzma Asghar; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Nicholas C Turner; Erik S Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  RB-pathway disruption is associated with improved response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Adam Ertel; Jeanne McFalls; Matias E Valsecchi; Gordon Schwartz; Erik S Knudsen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Clinical Development of the CDK4/6 Inhibitors Ribociclib and Abemaciclib in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Sara M Tolaney
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  QM-FISH analysis of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Yingbo Shao; Guofang Hou; Jingchao Bai; Weiping Yuan; Linping Hu; Tao Cheng; Anders Zetterberg; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-05

9.  Regulation of miR106b cluster through the RB pathway: mechanism and functional targets.

Authors:  Chellappagounder Thangavel; Ettickan Boopathi; Adam Ertel; Meng Lim; Sankar Addya; Paolo Fortina; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Erik S Knudsen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Putative tumor suppressor cytoglobin promotes aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand-mediated triple negative breast cancer cell death.

Authors:  Leah K Rowland; Petreena S Campbell; Nicole Mavingire; Jonathan V Wooten; Lancelot McLean; Dain Zylstra; Gabriell Thorne; Devin Daly; Kristopher Boyle; Sonya Whang; Juli Unternaehrer; Eileen J Brantley
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 4.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.