Literature DB >> 21367802

Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 4: current evidence does not support the use of a negative D-dimer to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

Sivanthi Sivandarajah1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21367802     DOI： 10.1136/emj.2011.111617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN： 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Diagnosing venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas Grüning; Rebecca E Mingo; Matthew G Gosling; Sally L Farrell; Brent E Drake; Robert J Loader; Richard D Riordan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

Authors:  E Conti; L Zezza; E Ralli; C Comito; L Sada; J Passerini; D Caserta; S Rubattu; C Autore; M Moscarini; M Volpe
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond.

Authors:  Marika Bajc; Carl Schümichen; Thomas Grüning; Ari Lindqvist; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Adriano Alatri; Ralf W Bauer; Mirza Dilic; Brian Neilly; Hein J Verberne; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Bjorn Jonson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  V/P SPECT as a diagnostic tool for pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Marika Bajc; Berit Olsson; Anders Gottsäter; Cecilia Hindorf; Jonas Jögi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Large D-Dimer Fluctuation in Normal Pregnancy: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of 4,117 Samples from 714 Healthy Danish Women.

Authors:  Katrine K Hedengran; Malene R Andersen; Steen Stender; Pal B Szecsi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2016-04-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.