Literature DB >> 21367788

Horseshoe bats make adaptive prey-selection decisions, informed by echo cues.

Klemen Koselj1, Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler, Björn M Siemers.   

Abstract

Foragers base their prey-selection decisions on the information acquired by the sensory systems. In bats that use echolocation to find prey in darkness, it is not clear whether the specialized diet, as sometimes found by faecal analysis, is a result of active decision-making or rather of biased sensory information. Here, we tested whether greater horseshoe bats decide economically when to attack a particular prey item and when not. This species is known to recognize different insects based on their wing-beat pattern imprinted in the echoes. We built a simulation of the natural foraging process in the laboratory, where the bats scanned for prey from a perch and, upon reaching the decision to attack, intercepted the prey in flight. To fully control echo information available to the bats and assure its unambiguity, we implemented computer-controlled propellers that produced echoes resembling those from natural insects of differing profitability. The bats monitored prey arrivals to sample the supply of prey categories in the environment and to inform foraging decisions. The bats adjusted selectivity for the more profitable prey to its inter-arrival intervals as predicted by foraging theory (an economic strategy known to benefit fitness). Moreover, unlike in previously studied vertebrates, foraging performance of horseshoe bats was not limited by costly rejections of the profitable prey. This calls for further research into the evolutionary selection pressures that sharpened the species's decision-making capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367788      PMCID: PMC3158933          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  TARGET DISCRIMINATION BY THE ECHOLOCATION OF BATS.

Authors:  D R GRIFFIN; J H FRIEND; F A WEBSTER
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1965-03

2.  Perception of structured phantom targets in the echolocating bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  S Schmidt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Prey conspicuousness can explain apparent prey selectivity.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; René Güttinger
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Prey availability and selective foraging in shorebirds.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Evidence for a spectral basis of texture perception in bat sonar.

Authors:  S Schmidt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An HRP-study of the frequency-place map of the horseshoe bat cochlea: morphological correlates of the sharp tuning to a narrow frequency band.

Authors:  M Vater; A S Feng; M Betz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Discrimination of wingbeat motion by bats, correlated with echolocation sound pattern.

Authors:  R C Roverud; V Nitsche; G Neuweiler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Frequent summer nuptial flights of ants provide a primary food source for bats.

Authors:  Eran Levin; Yoram Yom-Tov; Anat Barnea
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-12-16

9.  Echo-delay resolution in sonar images of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; C F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Moth tails divert bat attack: evolution of acoustic deflection.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Brian C Leavell; Adam L Keener; Jesse W Breinholt; Brad A Chadwell; Christopher J W McClure; Geena M Hill; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Beetle bioluminescence outshines extant aerial predators.

Authors:  Gareth S Powell; Natalie A Saxton; Yelena M Pacheco; Kathrin F Stanger-Hall; Gavin J Martin; Dominik Kusy; Luiz Felipe Lima Da Silveira; Ladislav Bocak; Marc A Branham; Seth M Bybee
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Dominant glint based prey localization in horseshoe bats: a possible strategy for noise rejection.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jonas Reijniers; Uwe Firzlaff; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Acoustic traits of bat-pollinated flowers compared to flowers of other pollination syndromes and their echo-based classification using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Ralph Simon; Karol Bakunowski; Angel Eduardo Reyes-Vasques; Marco Tschapka; Mirjam Knörnschild; Jan Steckel; Dan Stowell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  High-throughput sequencing reveals dietary segregation in Malaysian babblers.

Authors:  Mohammad Saiful Mansor; Fasihah Zarifah Rozali; Sian Davies; Shukor Md Nor; Rosli Ramli
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.734

6.  Sensorimotor Model of Obstacle Avoidance in Echolocating Bats.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Marc W Holderied; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.