Literature DB >> 21367780

Dome-shaped functional response induced by nutrient imbalance of the prey.

Berith B Bressendorff1, Søren Toft.   

Abstract

Nutritional ecological theory predicts that predators should adjust prey capture and consumption rates depending on the prey's nutritional composition. This would affect the predator's functional response, at least at high prey densities, i.e. near predator satiation. Using a simple fruitfly-wolf spider laboratory system in Petri dishes, we found that functional responses changed from day to day over a 7 day period. After 1 to 2 days of feeding, dome-shaped functional responses (i.e. reduced predation at highest prey densities) appeared in spiders fed nutritionally imbalanced prey, compared with steadily increasing or asymptotic functional responses with nutritionally near-optimal prey. Later again (days 5-7), the difference disappeared as the level of the functional response was reduced in both treatments. Experiments with adult females in spring and subadult spiders in autumn revealed opposite patterns: a dome-shaped response with high-lipid prey for reproductive females, for which protein-rich prey are optimal, and a dome-shaped (or simply reduced) response with high-protein prey for pre-winter subadults, for which high-lipid flies are the optimal prey. Our results have implications for predation theory and models of biological control that have, so far, neglected nutritional aspects; in particular, the dynamic nutritional state of the predators should be incorporated. This journal is
© 2011 The Royal Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367780      PMCID: PMC3130244          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

Review 1.  Consumer-food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders.

Authors:  Jonathan M Jeschke; Michael Kopp; Ralph Tollrian
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-05

2.  The role of nourishment in oogenesis.

Authors:  D Wheeler
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators.

Authors:  David Mayntz; David Raubenheimer; Mor Salomon; Søren Toft; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Prey nutrient composition has different effects on Pardosa wolf spiders with dissimilar life histories.

Authors:  Kim Jensen; David Mayntz; Søren Toft; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebrates.

Authors:  D Raubenheimer; S J Simpson
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.800

Review 6.  Insect herbivore nutrient regulation.

Authors:  Spencer T Behmer
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 7.  Modelling nutritional interactions: from individuals to communities.

Authors:  Stephen J Simpson; David Raubenheimer; Michael A Charleston; Fiona J Clissold
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Physiological conditions and variations of body constituents during the moulting cycle of the spider Tegenaria atrica C. L. Koch (Agelenidae).

Authors:  K G Collatz; T Mommsen
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1975-11-01

9.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems.

Authors:  M P Hassell
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1978

10.  Nutrient-specific compensation following diapause in a predator: implications for intraguild predation.

Authors:  David Raubenheimer; David Mayntz; Stephen J Simpson; Soeren Tøft
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  9 in total

1.  Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles.

Authors:  Kim Jensen; David Mayntz; Søren Toft; Fiona J Clissold; John Hunt; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Predator population size structure alters consumption of prey from epigeic and grazing food webs.

Authors:  Shannon M Murphy; Danny Lewis; Gina M Wimp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The nutritional content of prey affects the foraging of a generalist arthropod predator.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Peter Sebastian; Shawn M Wilder; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Responses of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Anegleis cardoni, to varying densities of Aphis gossypii.

Authors:  Gyanendra Kumar
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Diet and predatory behavior of the Asian ant-eating spider, Asceua (formerly Doosia) japonica (Araneae: Zodariidae).

Authors:  Takashi Komatsu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-10

6.  The lacewing Ceraeochrysa caligata as a potential biological agent for controlling the red palm mite Raoiella indica.

Authors:  Luis O Viteri Jumbo; Adenir V Teodoro; Adriano S Rêgo; Khalid Haddi; Andréia S Galvão; Eugênio Eduardo de Oliveira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Quantifying predator functional responses under field conditions reveals interactive effects of temperature and interference with sex and stage.

Authors:  Kyle E Coblentz; Amber Squires; Stella Uiterwaal; John P Delong
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Spider web and silk performance landscapes across nutrient space.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Yi-Hsuan Tseng; Chung-Lin Wu; Søren Toft; David Raubenheimer; I-Min Tso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Influence of maternal diet on offspring survivorship, growth, and reproduction in a sheetweb spider.

Authors:  Lelei Wen; Zengtao Zhang; Shichang Zhang; Fengxiang Liu; Xiaoguo Jiao; Daiqin Li
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.422

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.