Literature DB >> 21367562

Outcome of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarians.

Stuart B Prenner1, Irene C Turnbull, Gregory W Serrao, Eric Fishman, Sharif H Ellozy, Angeliki G Vouyouka, Michael L Marin, Peter L Faries.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compared with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), endovascular repair (EVAR) is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality in a standard patient population. This study sought to determine if the advantage of EVAR extends to patients aged ≥90 years.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review from a prospectively maintained computerized database. Of the 322 patients aged ≥80 treated with EVAR from January 1997 to November 2007, 24 (1.9%) were aged ≥90. Mean age was 91.5 ± 1.5 years (range, 90-95 years), and 83.3% were men. Mean aneurysm size was 6.8 cm (range, 5.2-8.7 cm).
RESULTS: Mean procedural blood loss was 490 mL (range, 100-4150 mL), and 20.8% required an intraoperative transfusion. Mean postoperative length of stay was 6.0 days, (median, 4 days; mode, 1 day; range, 1-42 days), with 33.3% of patients discharged on the first postoperative day. Amongst the 24 patients, there were 6 (25.0%) perioperative major adverse events, and 2 patients died, for a perioperative mortality rate of 8.3%. Mean follow-up was 20.5 months (range, 1-49 months). Overall, three patients (12.5%) required a secondary intervention, comprising thrombectomy, angioplasty, and proximal cuff extension. No patients required conversion to open repair. Two patients (8.3%) died of AAA rupture at 507 and 1254 days. Freedom from all-cause mortality was 83.3% at 1 year and 19.3% at 5 years. Freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 87.5% at 1 year and 73.2% at 5 years. Endoleak occurred in five patients (20.8%), with three type I and two of indeterminate type; of these, two patients with type I endoleak underwent secondary intervention at 153 and 489 days after EVAR, of which one case was successful.
CONCLUSION: Our study supports that EVAR in nonagenarians is associated with acceptable procedural success and perioperative morbidity and mortality. The medium-term results suggest that EVAR may be of limited benefit in very carefully selected patients who are aged ≥90 years.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367562     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

1.  A 103 Year Old Man With a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Satoshi Nishi; Kanan Kurahashi; Takaharu Shimizu; Daisuke Arima; Akihiro Yoshimoto; Yoshihiro Suematsu
Journal:  EJVES Vasc Forum       Date:  2020-02-27

2.  Designation as "unfit for open repair" is associated with poor outcomes after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Randall R De Martino; Benjamin S Brooke; William Robinson; Andres Schanzer; Jeffrey E Indes; Jessica B Wallaert; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-01

3.  Is Conventional Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Feasible in Nonagenarians?

Authors:  Kyokun Uehara; Hitoshi Matsuda; Yosuke Inoue; Atsushi Omura; Yoshimasa Seike; Hiroaki Sasaki; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-09-25

Review 4.  The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing system: current perspectives.

Authors:  Xin Y Choo; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; George A Antoniou
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-02-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.