Literature DB >> 21367356

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of asenapine for the prevention of relapse of schizophrenia after long-term treatment.

John M Kane1, Mary Mackle, Linda Snow-Adami, Jun Zhao, Armin Szegedi, John Panagides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Long-term efficacy of asenapine in preventing schizophrenia relapse was assessed in a 26-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that followed 26 weeks of open-label treatment.
METHOD: Stable schizophrenia patients (DSM-IV-TR criteria) who were cross-titrated from previous medication to sublingual asenapine and remained stable during 26 weeks of open-label treatment were eligible for 26 weeks of double-blind treatment, with randomization to continued asenapine or switch to placebo. Time to relapse/impending relapse (primary endpoint, as usually determined by specific scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness Scale) and discontinuation for any reason (key secondary endpoint) were assessed by survival analyses for asenapine versus placebo. The study was conducted from May 2005 through June 2008.
RESULTS: Of 700 enrolled patients treated with open-label asenapine, 386 entered (asenapine, n = 194; placebo, n = 192) and 207 completed (n = 135; n = 72) the double-blind phase. Times to relapse/impending relapse and discontinuation for any reason were significantly longer with asenapine than with placebo (both P < .0001). Incidence of relapse/impending relapse was lower with asenapine than placebo (12.1% vs 47.4%, P < .0001). The modal dosage of asenapine was 10 mg twice daily in both phases. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) considered serious with asenapine and placebo was 3.1% and 9.9%, respectively; incidence of extrapyramidal symptom-related AEs was 3.1% and 4.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported AEs with asenapine versus placebo were anxiety (8.2%; 10.9%), increased weight (6.7%; 3.6%), and insomnia (6.2%; 13.5%). The incidence of clinically significant weight gain (≥ 7% increase from double-blind baseline) was 3.7% with asenapine and 0.5% with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with asenapine was more effective than placebo in preventing relapse of schizophrenia and appeared to be safe and well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00150176. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21367356     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.10m06306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  27 in total

1.  Asenapine augmentation and treatment-resistant schizophrenia in the high-secure hospital setting.

Authors:  E Naomi Smith; Vijay Durge; Samrat Sengupta; Mrigendra Das
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-10

2.  [Antipsychotic medications for bipolar I disorders. New atypical neuroleptic drug asenapine approved].

Authors:  G Juckel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  Withdrawal symptoms and rebound syndromes associated with switching and discontinuing atypical antipsychotics: theoretical background and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Anja Cerovecki; Richard Musil; Ansgar Klimke; Florian Seemüller; Ekkehard Haen; Rebecca Schennach; Kai-Uwe Kühn; Hans-Peter Volz; Michael Riedel
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Asenapine: A Review in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Emma D Deeks
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  The Use of Continuous Treatment Versus Placebo or Intermittent Treatment Strategies in Stabilized Patients with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with First- and Second-Generation Antipsychotics.

Authors:  Marc De Hert; Jan Sermon; Paul Geerts; Kristof Vansteelandt; Joseph Peuskens; Johan Detraux
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 6.  Asenapine for the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders.

Authors:  Catherine Orr; Santosh Deshpande; Sonja Sawh; Philip M Jones; Kamini Vasudev
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.356

7.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Asenapine Compared with Olanzapine in Borderline Personality Disorder: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Paola Bozzatello; Paola Rocca; Maria Uscinska; Silvio Bellino
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Safety and Efficacy from an 8 Week Double-Blind Trial and a 26 Week Open-Label Extension of Asenapine in Adolescents with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Robert L Findling; Ronald P Landbloom; Mary Mackle; Wendi Pallozzi; Sabine Braat; Carla Hundt; Marianne Z Wamboldt; Maju Mathews
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 9.  Body weight and metabolic adverse effects of asenapine, iloperidone, lurasidone and paliperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc De Hert; Weiping Yu; Johan Detraux; Kim Sweers; Ruud van Winkel; Christoph U Correll
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  A review of the pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability of recently approved and upcoming oral antipsychotics: an evidence-based medicine approach.

Authors:  Leslie Citrome
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.