WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in onco-haematology patients. We aimed to study the epidemiology of IFI in neutropenic patients and estimate the economic impact of treatment of those infections. METHODS: All patients hospitalized in onco-haematology, and treated with antifungal agents, in 2005 were investigated. Four features were studied: the diagnosis for each patient, the antifungal drugs used, the thoracic densitometry reports and the sero-mycological data. Infectious episodes were stratified according to the EORTC 2008 classification criteria (10). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 1130 patients surveyed, 192 patients received systemic antifungal agents. Of these 46% had acute leukaemia, 29% bone-marrow allografts, 7% lymphoma and 18% other malignant haemopathies. Using the EORTC 2008 criteria (10), there were 8 proved IFI (3 aspergillosis, 3 candidosis and 2 other IFI), 17 probable IFI (11 aspergillosis, 6 candidosis) and 16 possible aspergillosis. The incidence of IFI was 2·1%. Eighty patients (41·7%) had received prophylaxis: 56 with fluconazole and 24 with voriconazole. Treatment was most often empirical (n = 127, 66·1%). Combination of two antifungals was used in 17 cases. The mean duration of prophylactic, empirical, proved/probable aspergillosis-directed, candidaemia-directed and combination treatment was 19, 19, 46, 32 and 27 days, respectively. The cost of antifungal treatment in 2005 reached almost 2,000,000 €, including 427,000 € for documented infections (proved and probable), 1,246,000 € for empirical treatment and 58,300 € for prophylaxis. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The incidence of IFI is low but the pharmacoeconomic impact is extremely high. Improved strategies are required to reduce the frequency and duration of empirical treatment without compromising beneficial outcome.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in onco-haematology patients. We aimed to study the epidemiology of IFI in neutropenicpatients and estimate the economic impact of treatment of those infections. METHODS: All patients hospitalized in onco-haematology, and treated with antifungal agents, in 2005 were investigated. Four features were studied: the diagnosis for each patient, the antifungal drugs used, the thoracic densitometry reports and the sero-mycological data. Infectious episodes were stratified according to the EORTC 2008 classification criteria (10). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 1130 patients surveyed, 192 patients received systemic antifungal agents. Of these 46% had acute leukaemia, 29% bone-marrow allografts, 7% lymphoma and 18% other malignant haemopathies. Using the EORTC 2008 criteria (10), there were 8 proved IFI (3 aspergillosis, 3 candidosis and 2 other IFI), 17 probable IFI (11 aspergillosis, 6 candidosis) and 16 possible aspergillosis. The incidence of IFI was 2·1%. Eighty patients (41·7%) had received prophylaxis: 56 with fluconazole and 24 with voriconazole. Treatment was most often empirical (n = 127, 66·1%). Combination of two antifungals was used in 17 cases. The mean duration of prophylactic, empirical, proved/probable aspergillosis-directed, candidaemia-directed and combination treatment was 19, 19, 46, 32 and 27 days, respectively. The cost of antifungal treatment in 2005 reached almost 2,000,000 €, including 427,000 € for documented infections (proved and probable), 1,246,000 € for empirical treatment and 58,300 € for prophylaxis. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The incidence of IFI is low but the pharmacoeconomic impact is extremely high. Improved strategies are required to reduce the frequency and duration of empirical treatment without compromising beneficial outcome.
Authors: Yuqian Sun; He Huang; Jing Chen; Jianyong Li; Jun Ma; Juan Li; Yingmin Liang; Jianmin Wang; Yan Li; Kang Yu; Jianda Hu; Jie Jin; Chun Wang; Depei Wu; Yang Xiao; Xiaojun Huang Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2014-10-08
Authors: Melissa D Johnson; Russell E Lewis; Elizabeth S Dodds Ashley; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Theoklis Zaoutis; George R Thompson; David R Andes; Thomas J Walsh; Peter G Pappas; Oliver A Cornely; John R Perfect; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Rayo Morfín-Otero; Martha Alvarado-Ibarra; Eduardo Rodriguez-Noriega; Jesus Resendiz-Sanchez; Dipen A Patel; Jennifer M Stephens; Manuela Di Fusco; Carlos F Mendoza; Claudie Charbonneau Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2018-09-06
Authors: Seung Beom Han; Seong Koo Kim; E Young Bae; Jae Wook Lee; Jong-Seo Yoon; Nack-Gyun Chung; Bin Cho; Dae Chul Jeong; Jin Han Kang; Hack-Ki Kim; Dong-Gun Lee; Hyun Sil Lee; Soo Ah Im Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.153