OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare outcome parameters in patients anticipated to have a good response to stimulation based upon baseline characteristics using either a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist protocol in their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all first-time IVF cycles performed during the time period 2005 through 2007 in an academic teaching center. Patients <40 years of age with a normal baseline follicle stimulating hormone (<10 mIU/mL) and normal antral follicle counts (> or = 3 in each ovary) were included. All patients studied were undergoing their first IVF cycle. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. RESULTS: Included in the study were 755 patients undergoing a GnRH agonist protocol and 378 patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle. Implantation rates (39.4% vs. 39.5%), cancellation rates (22.4% vs. 19.2%), clinical pregnancy rates (43.6% vs. 48.6%) and live birth rates (34.9% vs. 40.1%) were similar between GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist protocol groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates are similar in good responders utilizing either a GnRH agonist or antagonist during their first cycle of IVF.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare outcome parameters in patients anticipated to have a good response to stimulation based upon baseline characteristics using either a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist protocol in their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all first-time IVF cycles performed during the time period 2005 through 2007 in an academic teaching center. Patients <40 years of age with a normal baseline follicle stimulating hormone (<10 mIU/mL) and normal antral follicle counts (> or = 3 in each ovary) were included. All patients studied were undergoing their first IVF cycle. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. RESULTS: Included in the study were 755 patients undergoing a GnRH agonist protocol and 378 patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle. Implantation rates (39.4% vs. 39.5%), cancellation rates (22.4% vs. 19.2%), clinical pregnancy rates (43.6% vs. 48.6%) and live birth rates (34.9% vs. 40.1%) were similar between GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist protocol groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates are similar in good responders utilizing either a GnRH agonist or antagonist during their first cycle of IVF.
Authors: Chantal B Bartels; Reeva Makhijani; Prachi Godiwala; Alison Bartolucci; John C Nulsen; Daniel R Grow; Lawrence Engmann; Claudio A Benadiva Journal: F S Rep Date: 2020-09-25