Literature DB >> 21365614

Assessing endocranial variations in great apes and humans using 3D data from virtual endocasts.

Thibaut Bienvenu1, Franck Guy, Walter Coudyzer, Emmanuel Gilissen, Georges Roualdès, Patrick Vignaud, Michel Brunet.   

Abstract

Modern humans are characterized by their large, complex, and specialized brain. Human brain evolution can be addressed through direct evidence provided by fossil hominid endocasts (i.e. paleoneurology), or through indirect evidence of extant species comparative neurology. Here we use the second approach, providing an extant comparative framework for hominid paleoneurological studies. We explore endocranial size and shape differences among great apes and humans, as well as between sexes. We virtually extracted 72 endocasts, sampling all extant great ape species and modern humans, and digitized 37 landmarks on each for 3D generalized Procrustes analysis. All species can be differentiated by their endocranial shape. Among great apes, endocranial shapes vary from short (orangutans) to long (gorillas), perhaps in relation to different facial orientations. Endocranial shape differences among African apes are partly allometric. Major endocranial traits distinguishing humans from great apes are endocranial globularity, reflecting neurological reorganization, and features linked to structural responses to posture and bipedal locomotion. Human endocasts are also characterized by posterior location of foramina rotunda relative to optic canals, which could be correlated to lesser subnasal prognathism compared to living great apes. Species with larger brains (gorillas and humans) display greater sexual dimorphism in endocranial size, while sexual dimorphism in endocranial shape is restricted to gorillas, differences between males and females being at least partly due to allometry. Our study of endocranial variations in extant great apes and humans provides a new comparative dataset for studies of fossil hominid endocasts.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21365614     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  6 in total

1.  Comparative morphology of snake (Squamata) endocasts: evidence of phylogenetic and ecological signals.

Authors:  Rémi Allemand; Renaud Boistel; Gheylen Daghfous; Zoé Blanchet; Raphaël Cornette; Nathalie Bardet; Peggy Vincent; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Midsagittal Brain Variation among Non-Human Primates: Insights into Evolutionary Expansion of the Human Precuneus.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Pereira-Pedro; James K Rilling; Xu Chen; Todd M Preuss; Emiliano Bruner
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Effects of cranial integration on hominid endocranial shape.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; Thibaut Bienvenu; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Covariation of the endocranium and splanchnocranium during great ape ontogeny.

Authors:  Nadia A Scott; André Strauss; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Philipp Gunz; Simon Neubauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Facial orientation and facial shape in extant great apes: a geometric morphometric analysis of covariation.

Authors:  Dimitri Neaux; Franck Guy; Emmanuel Gilissen; Walter Coudyzer; Patrick Vignaud; Stéphane Ducrocq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evolution of brain lateralization: A shared hominid pattern of endocranial asymmetry is much more variable in humans than in great apes.

Authors:  Simon Neubauer; Philipp Gunz; Nadia A Scott; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.