BACKGROUND: Shift workers who experience sleep disturbances and exposure to light at night could be at increased risk for alterations in physiologic functions that are circadian in nature. METHODS: We investigated rotating shift work and menstrual cycle patterns in the Nurses' Health Study II using cross-sectional data collected in 1993 from 71,077 nurses aged 28-45 years who were having menstrual periods and were not using oral contraceptives. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eight percent of participants reported working rotating night shifts for 1-9 months, 4% for 10-19 months, and 7% for 20+ months during the previous 2 years. Irregular cycles (>7 days variability) were reported by 10% of participants. Seventy percent of women reported menstrual cycles of 26-31 days, 1% less than 21 days, 16% 21-25 days, 11% 32-39 days, and 1% 40+ days. Women with 20+ months of rotating shift work were more likely to have irregular cycles (adjusted RR = 1.23 [CI = 1.14-1.33]); they were also more likely to have cycle length <21 days (1.27 [0.99-1.62]) or 40+ days (1.49 [1.19-1.87]) (both compared with 26-31 days). For irregular patterns and for 40+ day cycles, there was evidence of a dose response with increasing months of rotating shift work. Moderately short (21-25 days) or long (32-39 days) cycle lengths were not associated with rotating shift work. CONCLUSIONS: Shift work was modestly associated with menstrual function, with possible implications for fertility and other cycle-related aspects of women's health.
BACKGROUND: Shift workers who experience sleep disturbances and exposure to light at night could be at increased risk for alterations in physiologic functions that are circadian in nature. METHODS: We investigated rotating shift work and menstrual cycle patterns in the Nurses' Health Study II using cross-sectional data collected in 1993 from 71,077 nurses aged 28-45 years who were having menstrual periods and were not using oral contraceptives. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eight percent of participants reported working rotating night shifts for 1-9 months, 4% for 10-19 months, and 7% for 20+ months during the previous 2 years. Irregular cycles (>7 days variability) were reported by 10% of participants. Seventy percent of women reported menstrual cycles of 26-31 days, 1% less than 21 days, 16% 21-25 days, 11% 32-39 days, and 1% 40+ days. Women with 20+ months of rotating shift work were more likely to have irregular cycles (adjusted RR = 1.23 [CI = 1.14-1.33]); they were also more likely to have cycle length <21 days (1.27 [0.99-1.62]) or 40+ days (1.49 [1.19-1.87]) (both compared with 26-31 days). For irregular patterns and for 40+ day cycles, there was evidence of a dose response with increasing months of rotating shift work. Moderately short (21-25 days) or long (32-39 days) cycle lengths were not associated with rotating shift work. CONCLUSIONS: Shift work was modestly associated with menstrual function, with possible implications for fertility and other cycle-related aspects of women's health.
Authors: Andrew S Rowland; Donna Day Baird; Stuart Long; Ganesa Wegienka; Siobán D Harlow; Michael Alavanja; Dale P Sandler Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Janet W Rich-Edwards; Donna Spiegelman; Miriam Garland; Ellen Hertzmark; David J Hunter; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; Handan Wand; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: P Levallois; M Dumont; Y Touitou; S Gingras; B Mâsse; D Gauvin; E Kröger; M Bourdages; P Douville Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: A Baumgartner; M Dietzel; B Saletu; R Wolf; A Campos-Barros; K J Gräf; I Kürten; U Mannsmann Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Pete N Lohstroh; Jiangang Chen; Jianming Ba; Louise M Ryan; Xiping Xu; James W Overstreet; Bill L Lasley Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Timothy I Morgenthaler; Janet B Croft; Leslie C Dort; Lauren D Loeding; Janet M Mullington; Sherene M Thomas Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Barbara Grajewski; Elizabeth A Whelan; Christina C Lawson; Misty J Hein; Martha A Waters; Jeri L Anderson; Leslie A MacDonald; Christopher J Mertens; Chih-Yu Tseng; Rick T Cassinelli; Lian Luo Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Chunfang Qiu; Bizu Gelaye; Marie Denis; Mahlet G Tadesse; Miguel Angel Luque Fernandez; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Cande V Ananth; Sixto E Sanchez; Michelle A Williams Journal: Placenta Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Shadab A Rahman; Leilah K Grant; Joshua J Gooley; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: D Stock; J A Knight; J Raboud; M Cotterchio; S Strohmaier; W Willett; A H Eliassen; B Rosner; S E Hankinson; E Schernhammer Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Irene Souter; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro; Audrey J Gaskins Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Audrey J Gaskins; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Christina C Lawson; Eva S Schernhammer; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 4.402