Literature DB >> 21364427

Clinical criteria for obtaining maxillofacial computed tomographic scans in trauma patients.

Thomas J Sitzman1, Summer E Hanson, Nila H Alsheik, Lindell R Gentry, John F Doyle, Karol A Gutowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 150,000 patients present with maxillofacial trauma annually to emergency rooms in the United States. Although maxillofacial computed tomography is a sensitive screening tool for identifying facial fractures, indiscriminate use leads to unnecessary radiation exposure and substantial costs. A decision instrument is needed to ensure computed tomographic evaluation of patients at high risk for facial fracture and limit computed tomography use in low-risk patients.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients evaluated at a Level I trauma center over a 3-year period. Inclusion criteria were maxillofacial examination on presentation, maxillofacial computed tomography, and head computed tomography. A total of 525 patients met the enrollment criteria.
RESULTS: Injury to the maxillofacial skeleton occurred in 332 patients (63.2 percent). The presence of any of the following five physical examination criteria identified patients at high risk for facial fracture: bony stepoff or instability, periorbital swelling or contusion, Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 14, malocclusion, or tooth absence. These criteria identified all but six of the 332 patients with a facial fracture (sensitivity, 98.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 96.5 to 99.1 percent). The negative predictive value was 87.8 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 76.3 to 94.2 percent). No patient determined by these criteria to be at low risk for a facial fracture required surgical treatment. If these criteria had been applied to the study population, radiographic imaging could have been avoided in 9.3 percent of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A decision instrument based on clinical criteria can ensure appropriate screening of patients at high risk for facial fracture. Application of this instrument may reduce unnecessary maxillofacial imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21364427     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182043ad8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Head Computed Tomography Versus Maxillofacial Computed Tomography: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Facial Imaging in the Detection of Facial Fractures.

Authors:  Zachary Gala; Di Bai; Jordan Halsey; Haripriya Ayyala; Kristin Riddle; Julien Hohenleitner; Ian Hoppe; Edward Lee; Mark Granick
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Use of Low-Value Pediatric Services Among the Commercially Insured.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chua; Aaron L Schwartz; Anna Volerman; Rena M Conti; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  A prospective analysis of physical examination findings in the diagnosis of facial fractures: Determining predictive value.

Authors:  Alisa Timashpolsky; Alexander B Dagum; Syed M Sayeed; Jamie L Romeiser; Elisheva A Rosenfeld; Nicole Conkling
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Validation of the "Wisconsin Criteria" for Obtaining Dedicated Facial Imaging and Its Financial Impact at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Authors:  Christopher N Stewart; Lily Wood; Ruth Jo Barta
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-15

Review 5.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination findings for midfacial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Romke Rozema; Michiel H J Doff; Konstantina Delli; Frederik K L Spijkervet; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A clinical decision aid to discern patients without and with midfacial and mandibular fractures that require treatment (the REDUCTION-II study): a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Romke Rozema; Mostafa El Moumni; Gysbert T de Vries; Frederik K L Spijkervet; René Verbeek; Jurrijn Y J Kleinbergen; Bas W J Bens; Michiel H J Doff; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  A clinical decision aid for patients with suspected midfacial and mandibular fractures (the REDUCTION-I study): a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Romke Rozema; Mostafa El Moumni; Gysbert T de Vries; Frederik K L Spijkervet; René Verbeek; Jurrijn Y J Kleinbergen; Bas W J Bens; Michiel H J Doff; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.374

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.