BACKGROUND: Cleft lip-cleft palate is a common congenital disability and represents a large biomedical burden. Through the use of animal models, the molecular underpinnings of cleft palate are becoming increasingly clear. Indian hedgehog (Ihh) has been shown to be associated with craniofacial development and to be active in the palatine bone. The authors hypothesize that Indian hedgehog activity plays a role in osteogenesis within the secondary palate and that defects in this pathway may inhibit osteogenesis of the secondary palate. METHODS: Palates were isolated from wild-type mice during the period of palate development (embryonic days 9.5 to 17.5). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used for detecting gene expression during osteogenic differentiation and cellular differentiation (Shh, Ihh, Ptc1, Gli1, Gli2, Gli3, Runx2, Alp, and Col1a1). Next, palates were analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin, aniline blue, pentachrome, and in situ hybridization to assess osteogenesis of the palatal shelf and expression of hedgehog pathway genes. Finally, the palates of Indian hedgehog-null mice were analyzed to determine the effect of genetic deficiency on palatal development osteogenesis. RESULTS: Increased Indian hedgehog and osteogenic signaling coincided with ossification and fusion of the palate in wild-type mice. This included a fivefold to 150-fold peak in expression of hedgehog elements, including Ihh, at embryonic day 15.5 as compared with embryonic day 9.5. Contrarily, loss of Indian hedgehog by genetic knockout (Ihh-/-) resulted in decreased secondary palate ossification. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest a role for hedgehog signaling during palatal ossification. The hedgehog pathway is activated during palatal fusion, and deletion of Indian hedgehog leads to diminished ossification of the secondary hard palate.
BACKGROUND:Cleft lip-cleft palate is a common congenital disability and represents a large biomedical burden. Through the use of animal models, the molecular underpinnings of cleft palate are becoming increasingly clear. Indian hedgehog (Ihh) has been shown to be associated with craniofacial development and to be active in the palatine bone. The authors hypothesize that Indian hedgehog activity plays a role in osteogenesis within the secondary palate and that defects in this pathway may inhibit osteogenesis of the secondary palate. METHODS: Palates were isolated from wild-type mice during the period of palate development (embryonic days 9.5 to 17.5). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used for detecting gene expression during osteogenic differentiation and cellular differentiation (Shh, Ihh, Ptc1, Gli1, Gli2, Gli3, Runx2, Alp, and Col1a1). Next, palates were analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin, aniline blue, pentachrome, and in situ hybridization to assess osteogenesis of the palatal shelf and expression of hedgehog pathway genes. Finally, the palates of Indian hedgehog-null mice were analyzed to determine the effect of genetic deficiency on palatal development osteogenesis. RESULTS: Increased Indian hedgehog and osteogenic signaling coincided with ossification and fusion of the palate in wild-type mice. This included a fivefold to 150-fold peak in expression of hedgehog elements, including Ihh, at embryonic day 15.5 as compared with embryonic day 9.5. Contrarily, loss of Indian hedgehog by genetic knockout (Ihh-/-) resulted in decreased secondary palate ossification. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest a role for hedgehog signaling during palatal ossification. The hedgehog pathway is activated during palatal fusion, and deletion of Indian hedgehog leads to diminished ossification of the secondary hard palate.
Authors: Céline Colnot; Luis de la Fuente; Steve Huang; Diane Hu; Chuanyong Lu; Benoit St-Jacques; Jill A Helms Journal: Development Date: 2005-02-02 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Yu Lan; Rosemary C Ryan; Zunyi Zhang; Steven A Bullard; Jeffrey O Bush; Kathleen M Maltby; Andrew C Lidral; Rulang Jiang Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: M Vikkula; E C Mariman; V C Lui; N I Zhidkova; G E Tiller; M B Goldring; S E van Beersum; M C de Waal Malefijt; F H van den Hoogen; H H Ropers Journal: Cell Date: 1995-02-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Aaron W James; Alexander A Theologis; Samantha A Brugmann; Yue Xu; Antoine L Carre; Philipp Leucht; Katherine Hamilton; Kenneth S Korach; Michael T Longaker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aaron W James; Angel Pan; Michael Chiang; Janette N Zara; Xinli Zhang; Kang Ting; Chia Soo Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: J N Zhang; F Q Song; S N Zhou; H Zheng; L Y Peng; Q Zhang; W H Zhao; T W Zhang; W R Li; Z B Zhou; J X Lin; F Chen Journal: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Date: 2019-06-18
Authors: Benjamin Levi; Samantha Brugman; Victor W Wong; Monica Grova; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan Journal: Organogenesis Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Joseph T Tarr; Timothy G Visser; Joanne E Moon; Honey Hendesi; Mary F Barbe; James P Bradley; Steven N Popoff Journal: J Cell Commun Signal Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 5.782
Authors: Cynthia J Wolf; David G Belair; Carrie M Becker; Kaberi P Das; Judith E Schmid; Barbara D Abbott Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Emily R Nelson; Benjamin Levi; Michael Sorkin; Aaron W James; Karen J Liu; Natalina Quarto; Michael T Longaker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240