Literature DB >> 21364411

Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions.

Katrin Seidenstuecker1, Beatrix Munder, Ajay L Mahajan, Philipp Richrath, Philipp Behrendt, Christoph Andree.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although free tissue-transfer with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is one of the best forms of autologous breast reconstruction, surgeons have remained guarded over selecting patients for the procedure in the presence of comorbid conditions. This study has investigated the relevance of these conditions.
METHODS: A prospective review of all free flap breast reconstructions (n = 624) was performed over a 2-year period at the Department of Plastic Surgery at the Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf. Patients were placed into three groups based on comorbid conditions such as age 65 years or older, active smoking, and body mass index greater than or equal to 30. Flap and donor-site complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-four breast reconstructions with DIEP or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps were performed in 558 patients (66 bilateral reconstructions). There were 36 patients older than 65 years at the time of surgery, 94 active smokers, and 79 patients with a body mass index of greater than or equal to 30. Flap complications such as venous congestion (n = 5), partial flap loss (n = 10), marginal necrosis (n = 15), and total flap loss (n = 5) occurred in 35 cases (5.6 percent). Donor-site complications such as delayed abdominal wound healing (n = 9), seroma (n = 8), abdominal hernia (n = 3), and bulging (n = 11) occurred in 31 cases (5 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite having significantly higher complications in the form of delayed donor-site wound healing in active smokers and higher total flap loss in obese patients, the overall complication rates compared with other reconstructive procedures are low. Microsurgical reconstruction with DIEP and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps is associated with low complication rates, excellent aesthetic outcome, and high patient satisfaction, even in patients with known risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21364411     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy of a multidisciplinary team-led discussion in predicting postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Wilson; M Dordea; A Light; M P Serra; S R Aspinall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  [Microsurgical techniques for breast reconstruction].

Authors:  M Pelzer; M A Reichenberger; G Germann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Free Tissue Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rami Dibbs; Jeff Trost; Valerie DeGregorio; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

5.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

6.  A multiple logistic regression analysis of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Samir Rao; Ellen C Stolle; Sarah Sher; Chun-Wang Lin; Bahram Momen; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

7.  The use of plasmakinetic cautery compared to conventional electrocautery for dissection of abdominal free flap for breast reconstruction: single-centre, randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Whitney T H Chow; Georgette Oni; Venkat V Ramakrishnan; Mat Griffiths
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  A single center prospective study of bilateral breast reconstruction with free abdominal flaps: a critical analyses of 144 patients.

Authors:  Christoph Andree; Stefan Langer; Katrin Seidenstuecker; Philipp Richrath; Philipp Behrendt; Tobias Koeppe; Mazen Hagouan; Christan Witzel; Samma Al Benna; Beatrix Munder
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-06-17

9.  The deep inferior epigastric perforator and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shane Tan; Jane Lim; Jacklyn Yek; Wei Chen Ong; Chor Hoong Hing; Thiam Chye Lim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05-16

10.  Delayed versus Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes.

Authors:  Frank P Albino; Ketan M Patel; Jesse R Smith; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.