OBJECTIVE: In rheumatology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is predominantly applied in the assessment and outcome measurement of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in hands and wrists, leading to the development of the RAMRIS (RA-MRI-Scoring) system. It was initiated by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT). The RAMRIS system has not been applied widely in the measurement of feet. We investigated the interreader and intrareader agreement of the RAMRIS scoring system in the assessment of feet in RA. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with RA who had radiological damage and/or arthritis underwent MRI. Two experienced readers independently read both complete sets. One reader read 6 random sets after the initial session, in order to assess the intrareader agreement. For evaluation of the intrareader and interreader reliability, quadratic-weighted κ scores were calculated per joint and lesion. RESULTS: For the forefeet, interreader scores were excellent, ranging from 0.77 (bone edema) to 0.95 (bone erosion). Hindfoot interreader agreement scores were highest for erosion (0.90) and synovitis global score (0.88), but edema and synovial thickness agreement were also acceptable (0.83 and 0.86). Intrareader scores were on the whole slightly lower, but excellent. CONCLUSION: Reliability (interreader and intrareader agreement) in the assessment of the rheumatoid foot according to the RAMRIS method is excellent.
OBJECTIVE: In rheumatology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is predominantly applied in the assessment and outcome measurement of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in hands and wrists, leading to the development of the RAMRIS (RA-MRI-Scoring) system. It was initiated by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT). The RAMRIS system has not been applied widely in the measurement of feet. We investigated the interreader and intrareader agreement of the RAMRIS scoring system in the assessment of feet in RA. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with RA who had radiological damage and/or arthritis underwent MRI. Two experienced readers independently read both complete sets. One reader read 6 random sets after the initial session, in order to assess the intrareader agreement. For evaluation of the intrareader and interreader reliability, quadratic-weighted κ scores were calculated per joint and lesion. RESULTS: For the forefeet, interreader scores were excellent, ranging from 0.77 (bone edema) to 0.95 (bone erosion). Hindfoot interreader agreement scores were highest for erosion (0.90) and synovitis global score (0.88), but edema and synovial thickness agreement were also acceptable (0.83 and 0.86). Intrareader scores were on the whole slightly lower, but excellent. CONCLUSION: Reliability (interreader and intrareader agreement) in the assessment of the rheumatoid foot according to the RAMRIS method is excellent.
Authors: Ronaldo Garcia Rondina; Ricardo Andrade Fernandes de Mello; Valeria Valim; Rafael Burgomeister Lourenco; Elton Francisco Pavan Batista; Ronaldo de Oliveira Júnior Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Jill Halstead; Carmen Martín-Hervás; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Dennis McGonagle; Anne-Maree Keenan; Anthony C Redmond; Philip G Conaghan Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Christian Buchbender; Axel Scherer; Falk Miese; Philipp Sewerin; Alexandra Haferkamp; Ralph Brinks; Hans-Joerg Wittsack; Gerald Antoch; Matthias Schneider; Benedikt Ostendorf Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Yousra J Dakkak; Friso P Jansen; Marco C DeRuiter; Monique Reijnierse; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yousra J Dakkak; Xanthe M E Matthijssen; Désirée van der Heijde; Monique Reijnierse; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Lindsey Cherry; Leonard King; Matthew Thomas; Frank Roemer; David Culliford; Catherine J Bowen; Nigel K Arden; Christopher J Edwards Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Heidi J Siddle; Richard J Hodgson; Anthony C Redmond; Andrew J Grainger; Richard J Wakefield; David A Pickles; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Philip S Helliwell Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Lukas Mangnus; Hanna W van Steenbergen; Elisabet Lindqvist; Elisabeth Brouwer; Monique Reijnierse; Tom W J Huizinga; Peter K Gregersen; Ewa Berglin; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Désirée van der Heijde; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 5.156