Literature DB >> 21362465

Relative developmental toxicity potencies of retinoids in the embryonic stem cell test compared with their relative potencies in in vivo and two other in vitro assays for developmental toxicity.

Jochem Louisse1, Süleyman Gönen, Ivonne M C M Rietjens, Miriam Verwei.   

Abstract

The present study determines the relative developmental toxicity potencies of retinoids in the embryonic stem (ES)-D3 cell differentiation assay of the embryonic stem cell test, and compares the outcomes with their relative potencies in in vivo and two other in vitro assays for developmental toxicity. The results reveal that the potency ranking obtained in the ES-D3 cell differentiation assay is similar to the reported potency rankings in the two other in vitro assays for developmental toxicity. TTNPB ((E)-4[2-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-1-propenyl]benzoic acid) was the most potent retinoid, whereas etretinate and retinol had the lowest potency. All-trans-retinoic acid, 13-cis-retinoic acid, 9-cis-retinoic acid and acitretin showed an intermediate potency. In vivo potency rankings of the developmental toxicity of retinoids appear to be dependent on the species and/or exposure regimens used. The obtained in vitro potency ranking does not completely correspond with the in vivo potency rankings, although TTNPB is correctly predicted to be the most potent and retinol the least potent congener. The lack of in vivo kinetic processes in the ES-D3 cell differentiation assay might explain the deviating potency predictions of some retinoids. Therefore, knowledge on the species-dependent in vivo kinetics is essential when using in vitro toxicity data for the estimation of in vivo developmental toxicity potencies within series of related compounds.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21362465     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  7 in total

1.  Extended evaluation on the ES-D3 cell differentiation assay combined with the BeWo transport model, to predict relative developmental toxicity of triazole compounds.

Authors:  Hequn Li; Burkhard Flick; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Jochem Louisse; Steffen Schneider; Bennard van Ravenzwaay
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Prospects and Frontiers of Stem Cell Toxicology.

Authors:  Shuyu Liu; Nuoya Yin; Francesco Faiola
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  A Novel Cell Penetrating Peptide for the Differentiation of Human Neural Stem Cells.

Authors:  Weili Ma; Geun-Woo Jin; Paul M Gehret; Neil C Chada; Won Hyuk Suh
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2018-07-09

4.  The role of metabolism in the developmental toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-containing extracts of petroleum substances.

Authors:  Lenny Kamelia; Laura de Haan; Bert Spenkelink; Ben Bruyneel; Hans B Ketelslegers; Peter J Boogaard; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  Predicting the in vivo developmental toxicity of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) in rats by an in vitro-in silico approach.

Authors:  Danlei Wang; Maartje H Rietdijk; Lenny Kamelia; Peter J Boogaard; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Retinoids and developmental neurotoxicity: Utilizing toxicogenomics to enhance adverse outcome pathways and testing strategies.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Megan A Chidboy; Joshua F Robinson
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Uncoupling RARA transcriptional activation and degradation clarifies the bases for APL response to therapies.

Authors:  Julien Ablain; Magdalena Leiva; Laurent Peres; Julien Fonsart; Elodie Anthony; Hugues de Thé
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.