Literature DB >> 21362102

Relationship between asthma control status, the Asthma Control Test™ and urgent health-care utilization in Asia.

Christopher K W Lai1, Fanny W S Ko, Arvind Bhome, Teresita S DE Guia, Gary W K Wong, Bin M Z Zainudin, An N Nang, Watchara Boonsawat, Sang H Cho, Kirthi D Gunasekera, Jian G Hong, Jeng-Yuan Hsu, Nhung N Viet, Faisal Yunus, Amartya Mukhopadhyay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Accurate assessment of control is an integral part of asthma management. We investigated the relationship between control status derived from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and urgent health-care utilization.
METHODS: Asthma Insights and Reality in Asia-Pacific Phase 2 (AIRIAP 2) was a cross-sectional, community-based survey of 4805 subjects with asthma from urban centres across Asia. A symptom control index was derived from the AIRIAP 2 questionnaire using the GINA control criteria for day- and night-time symptoms, need for rescue medication, activity limitation and exacerbations; lung function was excluded. The main outcomes were asthma control, based on these GINA criteria and the ACT, and the relationship between control and self-reported urgent health-care utilization (hospitalization, emergency room visits or other unscheduled urgent visits) related to asthma over the previous 12months.
RESULTS: Each of the symptom criteria was significantly associated with urgent health-care utilization, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 2.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.94-2.61) for daytime symptoms to 2.57 (95% CI: 2.29-2.90) for nocturnal awakening. Similarly, control status was significantly associated with urgent health-care utilization, with ORs of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.13-0.28), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.65-0.76) and 1.00 for controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled, respectively. The optimal ACT cut-off score for identifying uncontrolled asthma was ≤19 for subjects aged ≥12years. Urgent health-care utilization was reported by 57.2% versus 28.7% of patients scoring ≤19 versus >19 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The GINA control classification and the ACT are valid symptom-based measures that are significantly associated with urgent health-care utilization.
© 2011 The Authors; Respirology © 2011 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21362102     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01954.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respirology        ISSN: 1323-7799            Impact factor:   6.424


  14 in total

Review 1.  Chinese expert consensus on bronchial asthma control.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Implementation of GINA guidelines in Ho Chi Minh City: a model for Viet Nam.

Authors:  N V Tho; H T H Loan; N T P Thao; N T T Dung; L T T Lan
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2012-11-15

3.  Determinants for asthma control, quality of life and use of complementary and alternative medicine in asthmatic pediatric patients in four cities.

Authors:  Kam Lun Hon; Yan Min Bao; Kate C Chan; Kin Wai Chau; Rong-Shan Chen; Kun Tat Gary Cheok; Wa Keung Chiu; Li Deng; Chun-Hui He; Kin Mui Ieong; Jeng Sum C Kung; Ping Lam; Shu Yan David Lam; Qun Ui Lee; So Lun Lee; Ting Fan Leung; Theresa N H Leung; Lei Shi; Ka Ka Siu; Wei-Ping Tan; Maggie Haitian Wang; Tak Wai Wong; Bao-Jing Wu; Ada Y F Yip; Yue-Jie Zheng; Daniel K Ng
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  A territory-wide study on the factors associated with recurrent asthma exacerbations requiring hospitalization in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Ka Pang Chan; Fanny Wai San Ko; Kwun Cheung Ling; Pik Shan Cheung; Lee Veronica Chan; Yu Hong Chan; Yi Tat Lo; Chun Kong Ng; Macy Mei-Sze Lui; Kwok Sang Wilson Yee; Cee Zhung Steven Tseng; Pak Yiu Tse; Mo Lin Maureen Wong; Kah Lin Choo; Wai Kei Lam; Chun Man Wong; Sheng Sheng Ho; Chung Tat Lun; Christopher Kei Wai Lai
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2021-03-03

5.  Do we care asthma?

Authors:  S K Jindal
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Current control and future risk in asthma management.

Authors:  Erika J Sims; David Price; John Haughney; Dermot Ryan; Mike Thomas
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.764

7.  Educational and decision-support tools for asthma-management guideline implementation.

Authors:  Sae-Hoon Kim; Sang-Heon Cho
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2012-01-31

8.  Utilization and responsiveness of the asthma control test (ACT) at the initiation of therapy for patients with asthma: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohamed S Al Moamary; Ahmed G Al-Kordi; Mohammed O Al Ghobain; Hani M Tamim
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  Clinical significance of asthma clusters by longitudinal analysis in Korean asthma cohort.

Authors:  So Young Park; Seunghee Baek; Sujeong Kim; Sun-Young Yoon; Hyouk-Soo Kwon; Yoon-Seok Chang; You Sook Cho; An-Soo Jang; Jung Won Park; Dong-Ho Nahm; Ho-Joo Yoon; Sang-Heon Cho; Young-Joo Cho; ByoungWhui Choi; Hee-Bom Moon; Tae-Bum Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Time for a new language for asthma control: results from REALISE Asia.

Authors:  David Price; Aileen David-Wang; Sang-Heon Cho; James Chung-Man Ho; Jae-Won Jeong; Chong-Kin Liam; Jiangtao Lin; Abdul Razak Muttalif; Diahn-Warng Perng; Tze-Lee Tan; Faisal Yunus; Glenn Neira
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2015-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.