BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath studies suggest that humans exhale fine particles during tidal breathing, but little is known of their physical origin in the respiratory system during health or disease. METHODS: Particles generated by 3 healthy and 16 human rhinovirus (HRV)-infected subjects were counted using an optical particle counter with nominal diameter-size bins ranging between 0.3 and 10 μm. Data were collected from HRV-infected subjects during tidal breathing. In addition, data from healthy subjects were collected during coughs, swallows, tidal breathing, and breathing to total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV). Using general additive models, we graphed exhaled particle concentration versus airflow during exhalation. Exhaled particles were collected from expired air on gelatin filters and analyzed for HRV via quantitative PCR. RESULTS: HRV-infected subjects exhaled from 0.1 to 7200 particles per liter of exhaled air during tidal breathing (geometric mean = 32 part/L). A small fraction (24%) of subjects exhaled most (81%) of the particles measured and 82% of particles detected were 0.300-0.499 μm. Minute ventilation, maximum airflow during exhalation, and forced expiratory volume 1 second (FEV(1) % predicted) were positively correlated with particle production. No human rhinovirus was detected in exhaled breath samples. Three healthy subjects exhaled less than 100 particles per liter of exhaled air during tidal breathing and increased particle concentrations more with exhalation to RV than with coughing, swallowing, or rapid exhalation. CONCLUSIONS: Submicron particles were detected in the exhaled breath of healthy and HRV-infected subjects. Particle concentrations were correlated with airflow during the first half of exhalation, and peaked at the end of exhalation, indicating both lower and upper airways as particle sources. The effect of breathing maneuver suggested a major contribution from lower airways, probably the result of opening collapsed small airways and alveoli.
BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath studies suggest that humans exhale fine particles during tidal breathing, but little is known of their physical origin in the respiratory system during health or disease. METHODS: Particles generated by 3 healthy and 16 human rhinovirus (HRV)-infected subjects were counted using an optical particle counter with nominal diameter-size bins ranging between 0.3 and 10 μm. Data were collected from HRV-infected subjects during tidal breathing. In addition, data from healthy subjects were collected during coughs, swallows, tidal breathing, and breathing to total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV). Using general additive models, we graphed exhaled particle concentration versus airflow during exhalation. Exhaled particles were collected from expired air on gelatin filters and analyzed for HRV via quantitative PCR. RESULTS:HRV-infected subjects exhaled from 0.1 to 7200 particles per liter of exhaled air during tidal breathing (geometric mean = 32 part/L). A small fraction (24%) of subjects exhaled most (81%) of the particles measured and 82% of particles detected were 0.300-0.499 μm. Minute ventilation, maximum airflow during exhalation, and forced expiratory volume 1 second (FEV(1) % predicted) were positively correlated with particle production. No human rhinovirus was detected in exhaled breath samples. Three healthy subjects exhaled less than 100 particles per liter of exhaled air during tidal breathing and increased particle concentrations more with exhalation to RV than with coughing, swallowing, or rapid exhalation. CONCLUSIONS: Submicron particles were detected in the exhaled breath of healthy and HRV-infected subjects. Particle concentrations were correlated with airflow during the first half of exhalation, and peaked at the end of exhalation, indicating both lower and upper airways as particle sources. The effect of breathing maneuver suggested a major contribution from lower airways, probably the result of opening collapsed small airways and alveoli.
Authors: David A Edwards; Jonathan C Man; Peter Brand; Jeffrey P Katstra; K Sommerer; Howard A Stone; Edward Nardell; Gerhard Scheuch Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-12-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G E Carpagnano; O Resta; M P Foschino-Barbaro; E Gramiccioni; F Carpagnano Journal: Int J Biol Markers Date: 2002 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.248
Authors: Charles R Esther; Raymond D Coakley; Ashley G Henderson; Yi-Hui Zhou; Fred A Wright; Richard C Boucher Journal: Chest Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Michael A Schuit; Thomas C Larason; Melissa L Krause; Brian M Green; Brian P Holland; Stewart P Wood; Steven Grantham; Yuqin Zong; Clarence J Zarobila; Denise L Freeburger; David M Miller; Jordan K Bohannon; Shanna A Ratnesar-Shumate; Ernest R Blatchley; Xing Li; Paul A Dabisch; C Cameron Miller Journal: J Photochem Photobiol B Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 6.814
Authors: Lip Huat Saw; Bey Fen Leo; Norefrina Shafinaz Md Nor; Chee Wai Yip; Nazlina Ibrahim; Haris Hafizal Abd Hamid; Mohd Talib Latif; Chin Yik Lin; Mohd Shahrul Mohd Nadzir Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Katy-Anne Thompson; John V Pappachan; Allan M Bennett; Himanshu Mittal; Susan Macken; Brian K Dove; Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam; Vicky R Copley; Sarah O'Brien; Peter Hoffman; Simon Parks; Andrew Bentley; Barbara Isalska; Gail Thomson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jennifer H McKenzie; James J McDevitt; M Patricia Fabian; Grace M Hwang; Donald K Milton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Agnieszka Smolinska; David S Jessop; Kirk L Pappan; Alexandra De Saedeleer; Amerjit Kang; Alexandra L Martin; Max Allsworth; Charlotte Tyson; Martine P Bos; Matt Clancy; Mike Morel; Tony Cooke; Tom Dymond; Claire Harris; Jacqui Galloway; Paul Bresser; Nynke Dijkstra; Viresh Jagesar; Paul H M Savelkoul; Erik V H Beuken; Wesley H V Nix; Renaud Louis; Muriel Delvaux; Doriane Calmes; Benoit Ernst; Simona Pollini; Anna Peired; Julien Guiot; Sara Tomassetti; Andries E Budding; Frank McCaughan; Stefan J Marciniak; Marc P van der Schee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 4.379