BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide, a novel immunomodulatory agent, is reported to modulate stem cell differentiation, and have direct antiproliferative activity as well as inhibit inflammation and hyperalgesia. On the basis of this varied pharmacological profile, lenalidomide is under investigation as a treatment for a range of oncologic indications. PROCEDURES: Lenalidomide was evaluated against the PPTP in vitro panel using 96-hr exposure at concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 10 µM. It was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at a dose of 30 mg/kg administered orally (PO) once daily for a planned for 6 weeks. RESULTS: In vitro activity was not observed at concentrations up to 10 µM. Lenalidomide was well tolerated, and induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to control in 7 of 37 (18.9%) of the evaluable solid tumor xenografts and in 0 of 8 (0%) of the evaluable ALL xenografts. The best response in the solid tumor panel was PD2 [progressive disease with growth delay (EFS T/C > 1.5)], observed in 4 of 37 (10.8%) solid tumor xenografts. A single ALL xenograft showed a PD2 response. CONCLUSIONS: Direct antiproliferative effects of lenalidomide were not observed in vitro. In vivo lenalidomide demonstrated low activity against tumors in immune-deficient mice. Our results suggest that lenalidomide's utility in the pediatric clinical setting may depend upon its ability to induce antitumor activity through effects on host immune and stromal cells rather than through direct effects on tumor cells.
BACKGROUND:Lenalidomide, a novel immunomodulatory agent, is reported to modulate stem cell differentiation, and have direct antiproliferative activity as well as inhibit inflammation and hyperalgesia. On the basis of this varied pharmacological profile, lenalidomide is under investigation as a treatment for a range of oncologic indications. PROCEDURES: Lenalidomide was evaluated against the PPTP in vitro panel using 96-hr exposure at concentrations ranging from 1 nM to 10 µM. It was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at a dose of 30 mg/kg administered orally (PO) once daily for a planned for 6 weeks. RESULTS: In vitro activity was not observed at concentrations up to 10 µM. Lenalidomide was well tolerated, and induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to control in 7 of 37 (18.9%) of the evaluable solid tumor xenografts and in 0 of 8 (0%) of the evaluable ALL xenografts. The best response in the solid tumor panel was PD2 [progressive disease with growth delay (EFS T/C > 1.5)], observed in 4 of 37 (10.8%) solid tumor xenografts. A single ALL xenograft showed a PD2 response. CONCLUSIONS: Direct antiproliferative effects of lenalidomide were not observed in vitro. In vivo lenalidomide demonstrated low activity against tumors in immune-deficient mice. Our results suggest that lenalidomide's utility in the pediatric clinical setting may depend upon its ability to induce antitumor activity through effects on host immune and stromal cells rather than through direct effects on tumor cells.
Authors: Farrukh T Awan; Rosa Lapalombella; Rossana Trotta; Jonathan P Butchar; Bo Yu; Don M Benson; Julie M Roda; Carolyn Cheney; Xiaokui Mo; Amy Lehman; Jeffrey Jones; Joseph Flynn; David Jarjoura; John R Desjarlais; Susheela Tridandapani; Michael A Caligiuri; Natarajan Muthusamy; John C Byrd Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alan List; Gordon Dewald; John Bennett; Aristotle Giagounidis; Azra Raza; Eric Feldman; Bayard Powell; Peter Greenberg; Deborah Thomas; Richard Stone; Craig Reeder; Kenton Wride; John Patin; Michele Schmidt; Jerome Zeldis; Robert Knight Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yu-Tzu Tai; Xian-Feng Li; Laurence Catley; Rory Coffey; Iris Breitkreutz; Jooeun Bae; Weihua Song; Klaus Podar; Teru Hideshima; Dharminder Chauhan; Robert Schlossman; Paul Richardson; Steven P Treon; Iqbal S Grewal; Nikhil C Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Asher Chanan-Khan; Kena C Miller; Laurie Musial; David Lawrence; Swaminathan Padmanabhan; Kenichi Takeshita; Carl W Porter; David W Goodrich; Zale P Bernstein; Paul Wallace; David Spaner; Alice Mohr; Catriona Byrne; Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Cynthia Chrystal; Petr Starostik; Myron S Czuczman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Beatriz M Carreno; Joel R Garbow; Grant R Kolar; Erin N Jackson; John A Engelbach; Michelle Becker-Hapak; Leonidas N Carayannopoulos; David Piwnica-Worms; Gerald P Linette Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Taimur Sher; Kena C Miller; David Lawrence; Amy Whitworth; Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Myron S Czuczman; Austin Miller; William Lawrence; Syed Ali Bilgrami; Raman Sood; Margaret T Wood; Annemarie W Block; Kelvin Lee; Asher Alban Chanan-Khan Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2010-01
Authors: Leslie A Andritsos; Amy J Johnson; Gerard Lozanski; William Blum; Cheryl Kefauver; Farrukh Awan; Lisa L Smith; Rosa Lapalombella; Sarah E May; Chelsey A Raymond; Da-Sheng Wang; Robert D Knight; Amy S Ruppert; Amy Lehman; David Jarjoura; Ching-Shih Chen; John C Byrd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rosa Lapalombella; Bo Yu; Georgia Triantafillou; Qing Liu; Jonathan P Butchar; Gerard Lozanski; Asha Ramanunni; Lisa L Smith; William Blum; Leslie Andritsos; Da-Sheng Wang; Amy Lehman; Ching-Shih Chen; Amy J Johnson; Guido Marcucci; Robert J Lee; L James Lee; Susheela Tridandapani; Natarajan Muthusamy; John C Byrd Journal: Blood Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 22.113