| Literature DB >> 21360165 |
Anna Pękal1, Paulina Dróżdż, Magdalena Biesaga, Krystyna Pyrzynska.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Antioxidant properties of the water extracts of the commercial bagged fruit and flavoured black teas were evaluated and compared with typical black teas of C. sinensis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21360165 PMCID: PMC3215868 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-011-0179-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nutr ISSN: 1436-6207 Impact factor: 5.614
LC/MS/MS characteristics of studied compounds in negative ion mode
| Compound | Retention time, min | Q1 Mass (amu) | Q3 Mass (amu) | DP, V | CE, V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 2.18 | 169 | 125 | −45 | −20 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 2.39 | 353 | 191 | −20 | −22 |
| Caffeic acid | 2.98 | 179 | 135 | −10 | −24 |
| Syringic acid | 3.02 | 197 | 182 | −20 | −18 |
| Rutin | 3.55 | 609 | 300 | −65 | −56 |
|
| 4.14 | 163 | 119 | −20 | −18 |
| Synapic acid | 4.48 | 223 | 164 | −35 | −20 |
| Ferulic acid | 4.75 | 193 | 134 | −30 | −20 |
| Catechin | 5.12 | 289 | 109 | −45 | −34 |
| Naringin | 5.49 | 579 | 271 | −80 | −52 |
| Hesperidin | 5.75 | 609 | 301 | −65 | −30 |
| Epicatechin | 8.20 | 289 | 109 | −40 | −32 |
| Epigallocatechin 3-gallate | 9.55 | 457 | 169 | −35 | −22 |
|
| 13.26 | 146 | 103 | −30 | −14 |
| Luteolin | 14.46 | 285 | 133 | −60 | −44 |
| Quercetin | 14.72 | 301 | 151 | −40 | −30 |
| Naringenin | 18.71 | 271 | 151 | −45 | −26 |
| Genistein | 19.41 | 269 | 133 | −75 | −52 |
| Apigenin | 20.62 | 269 | 117 | −55 | −42 |
| Kaempferol | 21.82 | 285 | 151 | −45 | −25 |
| Isorhamnetin | 28.86 | 315 | 300 | −35 | −24 |
| Rhamnetin | 30.88 | 315 | 165 | −35 | −30 |
Fig. 1Total ion current of MRM of a Delight citrus and b Tropical fruit infusions and traces of phenolic compounds in MRM mode. MS/MS conditions described in the text
Contents of selected flavonoids and phenolic acids in tea infusions expressed in mg/L
| Caribbean | Delight citrus | Char ming | Temptation | Blue fruits | Forest fruits | Citrus | Tropical fruits | Yellow label | LOD (mg/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutin | 0.18 | 0.37 | 1.89 | 1.16 | 9.91 | 9.05 | 8.59 | 11.3 | 18.8 | 0.001 |
| Quercetin | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.17 | 0.03 |
| Naringin | 4.99 | 25.2 | nd | nd | 0.007 | 0.009 | 3.51 | 1.64 | nd | 0.001 |
| Rhamnetin | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.038 | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Luteolin | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.008 | nd | 0.006 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Hesperidin | 0.23 | 5.81 | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.69 | nd | nd | 0.005 |
| Catechin | 1.58 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 12.0 | 7.97 | 9.17 | 15.9 | 1.71 | 0.001 |
| Epicatechin | 1.87 | 0.72 | nd | 1.04 | 7.01 | 9.42 | 10.9 | 18.8 | 2.35 | 0.05 |
| Epigallocatechin 3-gallate | 0.63 | 0.024 | nd | nd | 12.3 | 14.9 | 21.7 | 29.8 | 9.47 | 0.001 |
| Gallic acid | 0.049 | 0.051 | 0.031 | 0.007 | 6.32 | 5.59 | 7.94 | 8.51 | 8.48 | 0.0005 |
| Ferulic acid | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.0060 | 0.036 | 0.046 | 0.001 |
| Synapic acid | 0.031 | 0.065 | 0.050 | 0.037 | 0.001 | nd | 0.010 | nd | nd | 0.001 |
| Caffeic acid | 0.041 | 0.052 | 0.076 | 0.037 | 0.018 | 0.020 | 0.031 | 0.023 | 0.020 | 0.001 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 2.44 | 1.74 | 2.72 | 2.44 | 1.77 | 1.72 | 1.60 | 1.72 | 1.93 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.069 | 0.098 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.0005 |
nd not detected, e.g. < LOD
Fig. 2Antioxidant capacity of flavoured black and fruit tea infusions measured by Folin–Ciocalteu method
Fig. 3Antioxidant capacities of tea infusions (expressed as mmol TR/g) measured by the CUPRAC method; lined rectangle—without incubation, shaded rectangle—incubation at 50 °C
Scavenging effect of aqueous extracts from selected teas on DPPH radicals
| Tea | Scavenging effect, %a | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min | 20 min | |
| Caribbean | 33.5 ± 1.7 | 51.9 ± 2.4 |
| Delight citrus | 25.1 ± 1.2 | 39.6 ± 1.9 |
| Char Ming | 29.1 ± 1.4 | 40.3 ± 2.0 |
| Temptation | 32.1 ± 1.6 | 55.0 ± 2.2 |
| Blue fruit | 67.6 ± 3.3 | 68.4 ± 3.4 |
| Forest fruit | 63.4 ± | 65.6 ± 3.3 |
| Citrus | 58.6 ± 2.9 | 58.5 ± 2.9 |
| Tropical fruit | 64.5 ± 3.1 | 67.7 ± 3.2 |
| Lipton yellow label | 63.3 ± 3.0 | 63.6 ± 3.0 |
aScavenging effect calculated as (A 0 − A t)/A o × 100, where A o is the initial absorbance and A t is the absorbance at increasing time t
Fig. 4The kinetic curves of scavenged DPPH by studied tea infusions. Solid lines—flavoured black teas, dotted lines—fruit teas